SebastianR
Active Member
On the future of Solar (vs. Coal, Natural Gas, Nuclear etc.): If one is to believe Toni Seba, we are heading towards solar becoming cheaper than the cost of energy transmission. At that point, it is game over for any other source of electricity: everything but solar would simply be more expensive than local solar installations.
Precisely for this reason, I'm so happy with the outcomes of the Florida/Nevada votes.
If the fundamental economics behind the technology are the way Toni Seba (and others) describe them and if both the Gigafactories (Solar in Buffalo and Battery in Nevada) are getting us to this point faster, I don't really see a gutted EPA do any harm on the energy front. Would I have wanted to see this cost curve go down a bit further before this election? Sure! But as I mentioned earlier, I'm starting to get pretty confident that the fundamental costs have shifted enough to make this one a winner (unless someone would get the idea to massively subsidise coal+oil+gas - which would really be silly).
Precisely for this reason, I'm so happy with the outcomes of the Florida/Nevada votes.
If the fundamental economics behind the technology are the way Toni Seba (and others) describe them and if both the Gigafactories (Solar in Buffalo and Battery in Nevada) are getting us to this point faster, I don't really see a gutted EPA do any harm on the energy front. Would I have wanted to see this cost curve go down a bit further before this election? Sure! But as I mentioned earlier, I'm starting to get pretty confident that the fundamental costs have shifted enough to make this one a winner (unless someone would get the idea to massively subsidise coal+oil+gas - which would really be silly).