EnergyMax
Member
No they haven't. One guy on stocktwits is just one guy making things up.They have invited ppl to become beta testers..
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No they haven't. One guy on stocktwits is just one guy making things up.They have invited ppl to become beta testers..
Not to be rumor mongering but Tesla has an awful big head count and an awful lot of equipment in the former NUMMI facility just to make 100,000 Model S & X - and it is not as thought they are not automation intensive either. At its peak NUMMI had about 5000 workers to produce 500,000 cars annually. Tesla has. 15,000 headcount already. Also I reacted when Musk tweeted the words Model 3 ramp - which is not really a normal term one would apply in the absence of any production capacity to ramp with for over a year.
They have invited ppl to become beta testers..
There will be resentment for sure and that is one part of the risk going up. The sum total of risk will go up enormously, but they still have to go through it or die more slowly. I think the death can go quick even if they don't do anything. It is enough with a decline of mid to high single digit % and then a recession.
But just because you work in a ICE company does not mean you are against the EV revolution. Many people just landed there by chance. They probably also don't realize how hard it is to transform the company, so in a way I think some workers and engineers will be just like the customers "Why are you/we not doing a serious competing BEV when Tesla is?" and assume it won't affect their job security as much as it will. Also there will still be demand for ICE for a while, there is no EV truck and still no sub $35k car so the ICE line can still go on for a while so some engineers and workers in the company can still work with that.
There is also big auto in countries with less strong unions that won't have this problem. I think personally that GM and Ford are among those that will have it hardest partly because of the union as you point out.
I fully agree with the problem of changing core competence from mechanical engineering and ICE to electrical, chemical engineering and software. It is another huge one for the risk pile.
One thing that is interesting is that they are still doing dividends, even VW . I think this shows that that they both underestimate the problems that lies ahead and that they are too focused on the short term stock holders. Both of these are factors that points to passiveness.
276K is good number compared to last known 192K before Friday close, it's 43% leap although the hourly order rate keeps going down. So we'll see positve response on Monday. I guess SP will stand above 240. This might be the true reason the Q1 report gets delayed, EM just doesn't want two pieces of good news overlapped together.
276K is good number compared to last known 192K before Friday close, it's 43% leap although the hourly order rate keeps going down. So we'll see positve response on Monday. I guess SP will stand above 240. This might be the true reason the Q1 report gets delayed, EM just doesn't want two pieces of good news overlapped together.
276K is good number compared to last known 192K before Friday close, it's 43% leap although the hourly order rate keeps going down. So we'll see positve response on Monday. I guess SP will stand above 240. This might be the true reason the Q1 report gets delayed, EM just doesn't want two pieces of good news overlapped together.
I also think his surprise at the order numbers is completely feigned.
276K is good number compared to last known 192K before Friday close, it's 43% leap although the hourly order rate keeps going down. So we'll see positve response on Monday. I guess SP will stand above 240. This might be the true reason the Q1 report gets delayed, EM just doesn't want two pieces of good news overlapped together.
You probably mean Q1 deliveries figure. Q1 report has been expected to come in May. Or have you heard that is delayed?276K is good number compared to last known 192K before Friday close, it's 43% leap although the hourly order rate keeps going down. So we'll see positve response on Monday. I guess SP will stand above 240. This might be the true reason the Q1 report gets delayed, EM just doesn't want two pieces of good news overlapped together.
...But just because you work in a ICE company does not mean you are against the EV revolution. Many people just landed there by chance. They probably also don't realize how hard it is to transform the company, so in a way I think some workers and engineers will be just like the customers "Why are you/we not doing a serious competing BEV when Tesla is?" and assume it won't affect their job security as much as it will. Also there will still be demand for ICE for a while, there is no EV truck and still no sub $35k car so the ICE line can still go on for a while so some engineers and workers in the company can still work with that...
Elon tweeted that it was 253k Saturday morning. I understand the point of staggering good news, but if delivery numbers aren't released by the end of the day today, they are not staying true to what they said they would do. Although it's true they didn't use the word "promise", Kruggerand
No they haven't. One guy on stocktwits is just one guy making things up.
Honestly, any "competitor" who hasn't already refocused the whole company into BEV is likely to already be a dead company walking. They have a very short timeframe to refocuse to BEVs now. It's still *possible*, but I expect a wave of bankruptcies instead. Competitors who are focused on BEVs and doing a bad job at it have a lot more of a chance than the guys who still think that ICE will rule forever.I personally have heard rumours of something in 2 years close to production that'll annihilate every competitor who didn't immediately refocus the whole company into BEV.
I agree with this.I agree with this, and I'd like to briefly explain my hypothesis regarding Elon's approach to Model 3 production timeline.
I believe Elon Musk is approaching this product launch completely differently than any other launch. This is the culmination of the mission of the company, and will be taken more seriously than any of his previous launch planning and timelines combined.
I believe Elon Musk has been arranging chess pieces for the last five years with one goal in mind: that the narrative, experience and launch of the Model 3 is wrapped in nothing but success. Every part of the narrative will be exceeding every expectation.
I don't. I think he fully expected a good order book; he expected to sell out 2018 production by the end of this year. But I think he's been tamping down internal expectations in order to avoid risking the company through over-optimism. If orders stay up *this* high, he will need to build the European factory a couple of years before he planned to. As one person pointed out, the bull projections were 100K reservations in the day after the reveal -- instead there were 115K in the day before the reveal, and another 115K in the day after.With that overall goal in mind, and in terms of timeline, I FULLY expect the launch of the Model 3 to launch earlier than 'the end of 2017'. I also think his surprise at the order numbers is completely feigned.
Yep, I figure he had all this lined up... but now he also has to build a European factory sooner than he intended to!Be prepared for information to come out that describes these step stones, such as a factory in a much higher state of maturity, a Model 3 production-ready build article (along with all the 'Part 2' features like autonomy and additional UI tech) by late THIS year and many other step stones.
Disagree. I think he's being sincere.
@Julian Cox
Julian, What do you think the updated goal will be for 2020? 1Mil/year runrate? 2Mil/Year? or something else?