Why did my thread about painting cars degenerate into an argument about manufacturing in California? Can any of you tell me how the State affects the quality of a paint job??? If so, I might think it was a worthwhile argument. Otherwise I think this thread is no longer worth pursuing for me anyway.
The discussion ended up here because the presumption is that California has excessively strict emissions laws when it comes to paint. Paint is thinned by adding volatile compounds to it. When those compounds evaporate, the paint cures, hardens, and permanently bonds to the surface it was applied to. California (as well as several other states in the US, and countries around the world) limit how many of these compounds and what kinds can be legally allowed in paint sold or used in their jurisdiction.
So modern paints use water as the thinning agent. Water evaporates, the paint cures, hardens, and permanently bonds to the surface it was applied to. The incorrect thinking is that water evaporates more slowly, or that it makes the paint inferior in some way, or that ecologically sensitive policies and regulations make everything worse. The facts, on the other hand, is that nearly every auto manufacturer has switched over to low "VOC" (volatile organic compounds) paints, with many of them switching to water-based painting processes. BMW, Mercedes, and I believe VW auto group has as well. Several states in the US require low VOC or no VOC paints, and all of Canada has the same requirements. Most popular "American" car brands are actually manufactured in Canada, so I believe they also do not use VOCs in their paint processes.
This all gets back to the fact that Tesla, by requirement and by intent, uses water-based paints. Their process actually surpasses California's requirements, which they did not need to do. So, the water used to thin the paint on Tesla's cars is no different than paint applied to a BMW M3, or a Porsche GT2, or a Maybach. The process is pretty well standardized across the industry, so there's little or no difference there either. So the paint issues we see making it to customer delivered cars, where there's an actual flaw in the paint, is down to quality control not catching the problem before the car leaves the paint booth, and not catching the problem before the car leaves the factory. That needs to change if Tesla want to improve their image in the industry, but the solvents used in their paint does not.