Did you read my post right above yours concerning electricity? You seem to have avoided commenting on those. For those without Gas run into their homes the dangerous electricity occurrences are 100% over gas.
Question: Why take the Electricity risk is the answer to why take the Gas risk because its more deadly/harmful per capita?
Fact: Even though planes fall out of the sky and kill bunches of people every time they crash.....planes are tremendously safer than all other forms of transportation.
But yet...some would want to post the picture of a plane crash to show how "dangerous" they are.
Sorry, was responding primarily to the, low occurrence is not equal to zero occurrence position of yours.
The point about electricity is a good one.
Logically, it might be completely valid.
Do you have any numbers due to fires or accidents as a result of an electrical appliance vs that of a gas one?
We can't look at the rate of accidents of all electrical as there are many electrical accidents that would happen even if gas were used for something in my house.
In other words, comparing the increased risk of having an electric water heater over a natural gas water heater. Not the total electric risk, as faulty wiring to a light bulb, or outlet that causes a fire has no impact on another appliance, unless you are getting rid of electrical connections as a whole?
Should we start a new thread on this? It really does take us far afield, but is a very interesting question if you ask me.