Rumor mill says no WDR, going straight to launch. This week's road closures are canceled.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems a bit risky to skip a full stack WDR. But what do I know…Rumor mill says no WDR, going straight to launch.
What is the risk? There is no payload, deadline, nor orbital plane involved. Only differential between WDR and launch is marine/ aviation notices.Seems a bit risky to skip a full stack WDR. But what do I know…
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1645875678657810439/photo/1Teams are focused on launch readiness ahead of Starship’s first integrated flight test as soon as next week, pending regulatory approval – no launch rehearsal this week http://spacex.com/launches/
My uninformed speculation is that doing a WDR with the full stack could reveal GSE issues that would not be apparent from the separate booster and ship fueling tests. But it seems like SpaceX is not concerned about it, so that’s good enough for me. Let’s launch already!What is the risk? There is no payload, deadline, nor orbital plane involved. Only differential between WDR and launch is marine/ aviation notices.
Sure, but problem != risk. Any risk is just as existent in a WDR as a launch attempt. Only difference is disappointment level.My uninformed speculation is that doing a WDR with the full stack could reveal GSE issues that would not be apparent from the separate booster and ship fueling tests. But it seems like SpaceX is not concerned about it, so that’s good enough for me. Let’s launch already!
One of the many benefits of a "hardware rich" development program...The launch attempt will be a WDR, and given they have zero timeline to meet, what's the point of going halfway now if the permit is so close...
They are hardware rich, but does that apply in this case? If anything, an extra WDR puts more stress on the rocket and stage zero, with added risk of something going wrong during detanking.One of the many benefits of a "hardware rich" development program...
My bad if intent unclear... I was attempting to suggest that not needing to go ultra-conservative with a WDR prior to launch is made more feasible when you are building boosters and ships at such a prodigious rate...They are hardware rich, but does that apply in this case? If anything, an extra WDR puts more stress on the rocket and stage zero, with added risk of something going wrong during detanking.
That's how I read it, but I'm unclear on what the WDR would do to reduce risk.My bad if intent unclear... I was attempting to suggest that not needing to go ultra-conservative with a WDR prior to launch is made more feasible when you are building boosters and ships at such a prodigious rate...
Right, skipping the WDR only makes sense because the launch permit is expected this week. If the launch permit wasn’t expected for six months, then you might as well do a WDR to learn what can you learn Before six months goes by.That's how I read it, but I'm unclear on what the WDR would do to reduce risk.
If this were a payload mission or had tight timing requirements, I'd agree.
Pretty much, yep.Is the difference between WDR and launch just the Big Red Button?
ie is the WDR exactly the same up until "T-1"?
Or... even more excitement... lolThe thinking process is, if everything goes without a hitch, why waste a good countdown, just simply light the fuse and release the clamp.
If there is a hitch then it is like a regular WDR.
For this attempt, SpaceX will not try to land either Starship or its booster. But eventually it hopes that the booster will fly back to its nearly 500-foot-tall launch tower, where it will be caught by a pair of arms that operate like giant chopsticks.
The Starship spacecraft itself, after completing its mission and reentering Earth’s atmosphere, would flip horizontal, fall back toward Earth in a kind of belly-flop, then right itself, reignite its engines and touch down softly on a landing pad. It’s a technique the company says will allow “missions to destinations across the solar system where runways do not exist.”