Indeed.With apologies to Donne, are the numbers in question Raptor engine numbers?
Computer, Enhance!
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indeed.With apologies to Donne, are the numbers in question Raptor engine numbers?
Deep inspections of B7 have revealed extensive damage from the recent spin prime mishap. B7 is effectively written off. Orbital launch attempt is switching to B8 & being delayed to NET october.
Repairs & modifications to OLS, to prevent repeat, are slowing things down a bit.
Ah drat... I was hoping my earlier suppositions were wrong and that the booster escaped damage. That having been said I was worried about engines, and this seems to indicate "booster damage", so I may indeed have been off base, but unfortunately a setback still.
And as far as I know there is still no information from SpaceX about B7 damage, which remains in the Mega Bay.We still don’t have any information from SpaceX — meaning a tweet from Elon — regarding possible booster damage. So I regard the tweets by DutchSatellites and Octagrabber to be unconfirmed.
B8 and S25 construction continues and parts have been spotted for B9 and S26 as well. A V2 Raptor upgrade is being tested at McGregor with electric thrust vector control (instead of hydraulic).As of writing, repairs are continuing on Booster 7, and it will likely still be undergoing repairs for the next week or two. So while an early retirement for the vehicle could be expected, the current target by teams is still an orbital flight by Booster 7 and Ship 24 with a notional target date of late August for the flight.
While these repairs are ongoing, Ship 24 has been undergoing several spin prime tests ahead of the long-awaited static fire test campaign. The first spin prime test occurred on July 18, with what appeared to be all six engines in a staggered sequence.
Two more six-engine spin prime tests occurred on July 19, and another pair of these tests happened on July 21, that time with one and two engines, respectively.
This seems speculative to me.Booster 9 has also started stacking in the Mega Bay beginning with its methane tank, and Booster 10’s aft dome was sleeved as well. As of last month, this booster was expected to fly from Florida rather than Starbase but plans may have well changed by now. However, it is interesting to note SpaceX’s desire to rapidly build vehicles at Starbase that will eventually fly from Florida rather than wait for the Starship factory at Kennedy Space Center to be fully built out.
Could be, I don't see inner engines as they roll out.That is great news! But I’m not assuming that B7 will be used for the first orbital test. They may use it just to test the outer ring of 20, as Elon’s tweet implies. Not sure.
Okay…so why give it exposure on TMC?Click bait headline. I didn't see anything useful in that video that we already don't know.
Height helps (vs test stand) and the exhaust itself is pretty harmless.Give the amount of exhaust it creates, I am wondering if an exhaust tunnel should be there when all 32 engines fire during launch. Otherwise don't you run the risk of the exhaust (and any potential debris) hitting back at the engines or some lower portion of the booster? I believe the shuttle booster used to have an exhaust, but SpaceX never had one even for Falcon Heavy.
That’s an interesting definition of harmless you’re usingHeight helps (vs test stand) and the exhaust itself is pretty harmless.