It's ridiculous and sad that this should even be a thing.
Anyway. Tesla isn't omnipotent, and we have seen that in a number of places, constraints from property owners or municipalities have dictated various aspects of Supercharger locations, including the number, placement, and signage of stalls. The choice might between having an arrangement that seems sub-optimal for Tesla owners or not having anything at all.
Bruce.
...and all 10 are getting paid 6 figures!
Based upon my experience with urban chargers at Livermore and Blossom Hill in San Jose, they are faster. Consistently closer to their max of 72 kw.
Yes, urban superchargers. The 2 differences from the traditional type being-- 1. they are power limited to 72 kW max (instead of 120 kW or, soon now, 145 kW); 2. But they don't dynamically share the available power. So pairing doesn't matter with them. As long as the stall is in proper working order, you'll always have 72 kW available to use. It makes for much easier scheduling at high traffic superchargers. You'll know almost exactly how long it will take to charge the amount you want, instead of having to guess/hope how long it will take based on whether you get lucky with an unpaired stall or not.
