GRA
Member
I'm not 100% sure, but this looks to me to be the first Supercharger sited to serve a National Park Service site. I.E., it's poorly located to serve long-distance traffic well, like most Superchargers. The upcoming Groveland CA site will be a gift for those who visit Yosemite, but that one is still to come.
I think that's extremely cool.
If I had the ear of the Supercharger team, I'd make a case for Supercharging the Blue Ridge Parkway/Skyline Drive and for the Natchez Trace Parkway, both of which would be a blast in a Tesla.
Moab (and Blanding) were definitely the first off-interstate SCs that served NPs/NMs (Blanding covers Canyonlands and Natural Bridges). In addition, Lone Pine and Beatty both serve Death Valley, and Lone Pine also provides access to Sequoia (Whitney Portal) and the southern part of Kings Canyon. Fresno serves Yosemite/Sequoia/Kings, although they need some closer inone closer.They still need more SCs surrounding Yellowstone, Yosemite (Groveland plus Lee Vining, as Mammoth is too far south, plus Mariposa/El Portal and Oakhurst/Fish Camp). The South Rim of the Grand Canyon needs one in Tusayan (Holiday Inn Express there), plus one more on I-40 in Ash Fork or Williams for east bound travelers. And Glacier needs at least one each east and west, plus one on I-90 that's positioned west of Superior. Crater Lake,How about Moab UT and Arches National Park?
Rainier, Olympic, and Lassen could all use coverage, and Joshua Tree wouldn't hurt.