-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
The fudsters could at least hire people that have a clue to write these fake fud reports.
ThisStockGood
Still cruising my Model S 70 2015
Hate to bring up Apple-Tesla relationship again(always OT), but this sounds sus...
Same Apple rumors recycled for click-bait article. Nothing new in article.
Drumheller
Active Member
The fudsters could at least hire people that have a clue to write these fake fud reports.
Next. Level.
Lol.
I am not a fan of Apple and dislike how much it appears in this thread. Looks like I'm going to be seeing more of it. I guess Apple can remove the seats and offer them as something additional you can buy since you probably already own some car seats.
TheTalkingMule
Distributed Energy Enthusiast
In for 1 Friday $690 @ $4.20 bro!
Looking for a rebound then capping to $699.98 on Friday. The traditional recipe.
Edit: Lol.....just looked and the contract executed at $420.69! If that's not a sign....
Edit again: Just realized that sell order was likely one of you people
Looking for a rebound then capping to $699.98 on Friday. The traditional recipe.
Edit: Lol.....just looked and the contract executed at $420.69! If that's not a sign....
Edit again: Just realized that sell order was likely one of you people
Indeed, clickbait retread of old rumors without named or dated sourcing. Although it got the expected attention of the algobots.
Excerpt:
Two people with knowledge of Apple’s plans warned pandemic-related delays could push the start of production into 2025 or beyond.
This could be a setup for a bounce tomorrow morning.
Last edited:
j6Lpi429@3j
Closed
Even if apple made an awesome car, it would only be drivable on apple roads. Then, the tenth generation iCar would be released without windows, wheels or doors, which would be trumpeted as a 'brave' decision. Also, in 2026, all older iCars would no longer work, or would be reduced to travelling at 5mph, for mysterious reasons.
In for 1 Friday $690 @ $4.20 bro!
Looking for a rebound then capping to $699.98 on Friday. The traditional recipe.
Edit: Lol.....just looked and the contract executed at $420.69! If that's not a sign....
Edit again: Just realized that sell order was likely one of you people
LOL in for one 12/24 $690 at $3.21 too.... off to the races...
It is not a dump. It's a buying opp
Bring it on. One of the hardest things I had to do today was just sit and wait.
Joe F
Disruption is hard.
So sell my AAPL and buy even more TSLA?
StealthP3D
Well-Known Member
And he really puts his money where his mouth is. This on TSLA.
That is labeled "STOCK OWNERSHIP" and I wouldn't expect him to own any TSLA. I have seen him listed as having "other conflicts". So maybe he's short 1 share just so he can claim he has a position.
Knightshade
Well-Known Member
I appreciate this retreading of old rumors stuff... it let me rebuy calls I'd just sold just a (trading) day ago for a quick 25% profit while knowing there was no actual news behind the pushdown to worry about.... will sell em again once it pops back up
The fudsters could at least hire people that have a clue to write these fake fud reports.
Gene Munster goes on TV and announces a monstrous price target for TSLA while at the same time saying the only thing that would change his mind is if AAPL started competing in EVs.
I'm sure all of these rumors have nothing to do with that.
The fudsters could at least hire people that have a clue to write these fake fud reports.
So LFP is their "next level battery technology" that Tesla is already using in MIC M3's?
And 2024... right...
Hope they succeed though, we need as many EV's as we can, the addressable market is every non-EV car on the roads today - severe gazillion to be precise.
LoL. Yeah Apple can't wait to jump into a low margin high capex industry because that's totally their style.
I find this very interesting that this could possibly be true that he is on because someone is paying for that to happen. How much would that cost I wonder and would CNBC need to disclose this?
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
