Jack Rickard has some interesting theories as to what's going on as to why Maxwell has been getting capacity and longevity improvements (he's not sure that even
they understand why they've been getting such good results). When you use a solvent-based binder, the solvent penetrates into every little crevase, and when the solvent is evaporated, it leaves the binder everywhere, creating a hindrance to ion migration, particularly after the formation of the SEI. The dry electrode tech however is based around a powder; it can't get into all of the tiny cracks. It's more like spot welding together the active materials. So you're leaving much larger channels that the electrolyte and ions can flow through.
That's his theory, at least. And it IMHO sounds quite reasonable.
Honestly, I know everyone loves to hype up every new tech, and I'm usually the first to throw cold water on it. But I really, really like what Maxwell has been doing. Remember that the cell property improvements are actually a sideshow to the main issue, which is production throughput relative to floor space and depreciation.
That's what Tesla is hungry for: cost reduction. But they may simultaneously end up with some superb cells as a result.