You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Once FSD is 1.5-2X better than a human you'll be watching Netflix with the rest of us. At around that point you'll be more likely to cause an accident than prevent one, plus you wouldn't get to watch Netflix (or do work, browse internet, play video games etc).Most accidents shouldn't happen. That doesn't mean it's not good to prevent them.
I will be monitoring FSD (with my butt in the driver's seat) until it's at least ten times safer than your average driver and long after it has already reduced the overall accident and death rate. They say "two heads are better than one" and a FSD car being monitored by a human is safer than either one alone.
Edmunds vs Rob. The Edmunds guy says that 15° difference between tests do not matter for a range test comparison and that somehow 800V systems are not affected by temperature.
and this gem:
Haven't watched the video yet, but this quote is hilarious. It is not just that cold affects range as the battery performs worse. It is also that those cars tested below the temperature the AC was set to (most likely) had to use some amount of cabin heating, which also eats into the battery. I for one like those Norwegian tests where they drive all the cars at the very same time until the batteries die on the road.
Edmunds vs Rob. The Edmunds guy says that 15° difference between tests do not matter for a range test comparison and that somehow 800V systems are not affected by temperature.
and this gem:
And considerable loss of range in cold weather because of higher air density (air friction).Haven't watched the video yet, but this quote is hilarious. It is not just that cold affects range as the battery performs worse. It is also that those cars tested below the temperature the AC was set to (most likely) had to use some amount of cabin heating, which also eats into the battery. I for one like those Norwegian tests where they drive all the cars at the very same time until the batteries die on the road.
View attachment 648962
Edmunds drove the Taycan in power limited ECO mode. In that mode, the car becomes FWD only (rear engine disabled) and top speed is limited by 70mph. In other words, it becomes another car in terms of performance. This mode is called "limp mode" in a Tesla.
Edmunds vs Rob. The Edmunds guy says that 15° difference between tests do not matter for a range test comparison and that somehow 800V systems are not affected by temperature.
and this gem:
High tide in Suez Canal at 2 AM PST Monday. Good chance that ship will be moving by the opening bell.
I expect traders will be bullish when canal blockage is relieved. Ahhhhhh
Apparently a Chinese co has already started on prototypes for 4680 cells using tabless tech, with batch production this year and scale production next year. If they are legit, this will be good news for increased supply for Tesla, especially if it looks to launch the Model 2 in 22/23.
BAK Battery Unveils First Chinese 4680 Battery Cells
Fingers crossed it’s because there has been a strategic reallocation to Tesla energy large scale rollout.Hmmm...
Elon Musk Says Battery Cell Constraints A Hiccup In Tesla Semi Rollout
Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) CEO Elon Musk tempered down expectations on the automaker’s cell and electric truck production numbers. What Happened: The executive disclosed that the company was “too cell-constrained” in a response to a question related to the Tesla Semi on Twitter. We are too...www.google.com
You read it wrong!My gosh, this shocking new headline, that Elon admits to being battery constrained!
I think Elon is sick and tired of trying to convince anyone.. Tesla has put the evidence out in clear daylight . spelled it out with capital letters.I hope the Tesla Semi at least reaches limited production soon, as it's strategically important to demonstrate that BEVs can do long-range HDV transport. It doesn't seem like Elon understands this.
Quite a few organizations are saying that market is destined for hydrogen, but I believe that is wrong. It would be easier for policy makers if Tesla Semi can demonstrate this in practice, otherwise they are likely to waste tax-payer money on obsolete technology
Edmunds drove the Taycan in power limited ECO mode. In that mode, the car becomes FWD only (rear engine disabled) and top speed is limited by 70mph. In other words, it becomes another car in terms of performance. This mode is called "limp mode" in a Tesla.
So, in half-powered ECO mode Taycan exceeds EPA range. So what? That is the expected result. Less power brings more range. "Limp mode" all the way.
EPA does its testing using the default drive mode and that mode is determined by the carmaker itself. Drive Taycan in default drive mode like EPA did and see what you get (you get less than EPA score).
And how many people drive Taycan in ECO mode in "real world" ?
Tesla does not have a half-powered ECO mode. Most other EVs have. That is what Edmunds' range test is telling.
The Model S could go over 1,000 km....i know this forum frowns on doing anything practical to address criticism of Tesla, on the basis that it'd be "bowing down to media overlords" but the obvious solution here is to introduce a Captain Planet Mode that is FWD, top-speed limited, and super-Chill. Maybe even boost regen and reduce cabin climate functions if there's anything to gain there.