You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Regarding dual casting: Per Elon on the Q2 2021 call, Texas and Berlin will be the first with front cast Ys.Are we sure that the MIC Model 3 isn't already updated to the front and rear cast concept? That would explain the massive production increase.
Here's a few closing prices to chew on.
Oct 8 - $785.49Nov 4 - $1229.91Nov 15 - $1013.39
This is a rise of $444.42 (50+%?) over about a month. A brisk pace, followed by a correction of $216.52 to yesterday's close. A roughly 50% retracement of that gain.
This appears to be reasonably normal behavior, often enough seen in the market. I think this is considered healthier than an extended meteoric rise, and the inevitable larger correction.
To me this looks like equilibrium playing toward balance before the next uptick.
One of my favorite pasttimes has become waiting for TSLA's next uptick, which the fundamentals suggest will most certainly come.
Just thought this might offer data to consider that may help calm some of the worriers.
Don't worry, be happy. We're just throttling back approaching Max-Q before reaching escape velocity.
Edit: Corrected a percentage. Still getting that first cup of coffee into play.
So, even if Tesla screwed up with the contract, should JPM be allowed to act in such a manner?I also want to buy options/warrants where I can change the strike price without agreement from the other side of the transaction. Where can I buy those?
Either Tesla screwed up this contract by allowing JPMorgan to do this, or JPMorgan thinks the contract wording can be interpreted in such a way.
The spike yesterday was caused by a rumor Elon was selling the remaining shares in a secondary.
They could, but there’s a lot involved (list is too vast) but more importantly the vendors are going to want long term contracts to make the parts. No supplier is going to agree to do all the work involved for a quarter or two, then bank enough parts (that alone requires tremendous square footage) while Tesla repeats all the work necessary to then get the dies up and running themselves.Why can't the stamped items be produced locally at Berlin/Austin (in the medium term)?
Looking at upfront costs only will make you blind to long term costs. The cheapest part of horse ownership is the purchase price.Your bold italicised statement above is the point I made in my OP - if the Model Y line(s) in Shanghai are capable of making Model 3s they would have to have rear castings.
Investing in some additional stamping and casting dies for Berlin and Austin would be much less expensive than building additional lines (which would include stamping and casting) dedicated to the Model 3.
They could, but there’s a lot involved (list is too vast) but more importantly the vendors are going to want long term contracts to make the parts. No supplier is going to agree to do all the work involved for a quarter or two, then bank enough parts (that alone requires tremendous square footage) while Tesla repeats all the work necessary to then get the dies up and running themselves.
No. Wayyyyyy too much work, way too much man power required, way too costly and screws the suppliers, who won’t be tier 1 or 2 because that level of supplier would never agree to the situation.
Milton’s legal team was also hoping to have the case moved out of New York to Arizona or Utah on the grounds that the alleged lies were told in those states, and not New York.
Too early to draw conclusions other than that it's now all fine and we can start being nice on here again.
The “shortzes” have effectively pulled max pain down to ~960 in the past week (for Nov 19 expiry) thats a solid 140$ in a few days. My guess it’ll move slightly lower.My maths and assumption could have been all wrong, but it seems if I can do it, then shortzes could do it, too. We might be seeing a little bit of short covering in advance of tonight and maybe tomorrow SEC filing. Fingers crossed.
I was suggesting that Tesla could stamp these items themselves at Berlin and Austin, as they already do at Fremont and Shanghai. This would be after the Model Y ramp in each case, so we would be talking no earlier than 2023. No contracts with vendors required or need to bank parts.They could, but there’s a lot involved (list is too vast) but more importantly the vendors are going to want long term contracts to make the parts. No supplier is going to agree to do all the work involved for a quarter or two, then bank enough parts (that alone requires tremendous square footage) while Tesla repeats all the work necessary to then get the dies up and running themselves.
No. Wayyyyyy too much work, way too much man power required, way too costly and screws the suppliers, who won’t be tier 1 or 2 because that level of supplier would never agree to the situation.