i don't think i've ever seen a more precisely incorrect post.
Limiting the spread of "misinformation" is limiting free speech. Yes, you and I have a right to lie.
no, you literally don't. Certain types of lying is legal under certain cirucmstances, but lying is very illegal in myriad circumstances, from libel to perjury to yelling "fire" in a crowded theatre to claiming to be a military veteran to mislabeling something you have for sale to misreporting your income and thousands other situations. There is absolutely no "right to lie".
What you call a lie, I call a truth. Who is to judge?
This is so nonsensical that it calls into question whether or not you think words even have meaning. Stating something untrue is a lie. Anyone with the appropriate knowledge is qualified to judge whether a statement is a lie or not. Pretending that "all opinions are valid" or that truth is some wishy-washy malleable concept is both stupid and dangerous.
What we don't have right to do is limiting each other ability to lie.
We absolutely do have that right, in the form of the FDA regulations, disclosure requirements, civil suits, class action lawsuits, and regulations from every agency under the sun, and thousands of other safeguards that attempt to prevent lies and misinformation from endangering people every day.
Furthermore, any corporation absolutely, inarguably has the right to do whatever they want to limit speech on a platform they own. (and indeed they have a legal obligation to do so if what's being posted is itself illegal)
your above statement is objectively, factually wrong.
Spreading lies is not a basic American right. It's a destructive force for evil, and so is the notion that nobody can judge what's really a lie or the truth.
We also don't have right to pretend to be bigger than we are.
Except of course we do. There's no law against being a blowhard, or i'd have been put away long ago. (har har)