Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
For the care bears who are worried that no Republicans buy teslas anyways.

Survey puts Republicans at 30% vs 38% democrats.


That's no surprise, the majority of people buy products they like no matter what political affiliation the CEO is, nor however the CEO conducts his personal life. There is a vocal minority who conduct crusades against this or that based on feelings and emotions, but most people don't really care about that kind of stuff, they simply buy what they want and enjoy their lives. Steve Jobs was a terrible person yet iPhones have always sold incredibly well. Bill Gates ain't no angel yet Microsoft and Windows are giants to this day.

Great products sell themselves, and the truth is no amount of effort by any vocal minority will change that.
 
So what's up with the accelerated delivery of MY Tesla offers for waiting buyers?

279 miles of range vs 330 LR
0-60 in 5.0 seconds vs 4.7 LR

Is this the new form factor with front and rear gigacastings and new batteries?
Why would anybody go for lower range and acceleration?
Yeah, these are Austin cars.
Gets the newest, shiniest Y sooner.
Price is $3k lower than LR also.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kbM3
They want Tesla to buy back shares as the profits roll in. They can’t buy back shares on credit. I mean I guess they could use a margin account but that sounds like a disastrously bad idea.

If your company is issuing new net debt while performing share buybacks, functionally you are borrowing money to buy back shares. Poorly run firms do this often… GM did it a whole bunch during the teens after it had its debt discharged in bankruptcy.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: UncaNed and traxila
Rivian and Lucid +6%... thanks Dan
Dan Ives today showed exactly how clueless of an analyst he is.

The may 2nd quarter had lost a total of anywhere from 50,000-100,000 of production for this year. That’s like 4-8% of 2022’s total production.

Yet he slashed his PT by 27%. Sure Dan. He also didn’t alter his PT after Tesla blew away his EPS estimate in Q1.

I expect the streak of bull side analyst to continue showing their true ignorance over the next month
 

"The underground loop being built by Elon Musk’s Boring Company will allow Tesla programmed vehicles to travel over 100 mph through the underground tunnel with no congestion. It’s expected to receive full approval at the June 2 Las Vegas City Council meeting.

The cost of the project is being funded by the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Bureau, the casinos who will have stops along the way and the Boring Company, who will be tasked with operating the system and receiving the revenue generated by the rides.

At full build-out, the Loop will have 51 stations and take 57,000 passengers an hour."

So, at full build out - does the math -

57000 passengers / hr x 24 hrs / day x 365 days / year x $1 / passenger = $499.32 M a year in revenue just from Vegas alone.

How would this revenue be shared between Boring / Vegas / Tesla?

Also, that's one municipality, there's over 3000 counties and 19000 municipalities in the US alone.
 
Dan Ives today showed exactly how clueless of an analyst he is.

The may 2nd quarter had lost a total of anywhere from 50,000-100,000 of production for this year. That’s like 4-8% of 2022’s total production.

Yet he slashed his PT by 27%.

What especially annoys me when people do this, is that Tesla, if they know they can only produce X vehicles instead of 2X, can simply choose to build the most expensive variants, prioritize the performance Ys, and the Ys with FSDs etc.. The ones with frankly gratuitous profit margins!
Plus if the parts are still being delivered, there is scope to make up the shortfall over time with extra shifts... its just really bad analysis.
 
Some more info:


"The San Antonio tunnel project is expected to generate a net revenue of up to $25 million per year, with fares between $10 to $12."

Add a zero to the Las Vegas project for a $10 fare rather than $1 ... ~$5B a year in revenue.
 
  • Disagree
  • Informative
Reactions: MP3Mike and Paul_SF
So, at full build out - does the math -

57000 passengers / hr x 24 hrs / day x 365 days / year x $1 / passenger = $499.32 M a year in revenue just from Vegas alone.

How would this revenue be shared between Boring / Vegas / Tesla?

Also, that's one municipality, there's over 3000 counties and 19000 municipalities in the US alone.
They aren't going to run at capacity 24x7... Probably not anywhere near that.

And the only revenue Tesla is likely to see is from the handful of vehicles they sell to the Boring company.
 
They aren't going to run at capacity 24x7... Probably not anywhere near that.

And the only revenue Tesla is likely to see is from the handful of vehicles they sell to the Boring company.

Are you sure? Which company are riders going to interface with in terms of a mobile app to hail a ride...? Would these Tesla vehicles strictly be sold to Boring company and be used in the tunnels or, as mentioned by Elon in various talks, have ways to get surface-side and go via roads outside of the tunnels?

(not asking leading questions, I really don't know)
 
Some more info:


"The San Antonio tunnel project is expected to generate a net revenue of up to $25 million per year, with fares between $10 to $12."

Add a zero to the Las Vegas project for a $10 fare rather than $1 ... ~$5B a year in revenue.

Still no. Look at some of the details they provide:

The presentation stated that 100 Tesla vehicles could transport about 32,000 passengers through the San Antonio tunnel daily on average. It would have a maximum capacity of transporting 4,500 passengers per hour with 100 vehicles. If the tunnel’s Tesla fleet increased to 350 vehicles, it would be able to accommodate 112,000 commuters daily and 15,750 passengers per hour from the airport to downtown.

So while they have a capacity of 4,500/hour, they are only expecting 32,000/day. So they are only expecting an overall ~30% utilization. That might be higher in Las Vegas, or it might be lower because they build out for a higher peak capacity.
 
What especially annoys me when people do this, is that Tesla, if they know they can only produce X vehicles instead of 2X, can simply choose to build the most expensive variants, prioritize the performance Ys, and the Ys with FSDs etc.. The ones with frankly gratuitous profit margins!
Plus if the parts are still being delivered, there is scope to make up the shortfall over time with extra shifts... its just really bad analysis.
What’s worse is that if you go back to webush’s earlier notes from the last 6 months, their base case PT of 1400 (with a bull case of 1800) is predicated on Tesla achieving a 2 million annual run rate by the end of 2022. Absolutely nothing has changed there.

He also mentions 6 months ago, his PT was based on Tesla expanding margins…..which they did. While Q2 margins might take a hit, they will continue to expand margins in Q3/Q4.

Dan Ives is a story/narrative driven analyst who really uses top line numbers without doing any of the actual work.
 
Last edited:
So what's up with the accelerated delivery of MY Tesla offers for waiting buyers?

279 miles of range vs 330 LR
0-60 in 5.0 seconds vs 4.7 LR

Is this the new form factor with front and rear gigacastings and new batteries?
Why would anybody go for lower range and acceleration?
If Tesla is battery constrained, they can stretch the number of cars they sell by offering the lower mileage variant. Not positive that's the reason, but may be.