Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
What happens at 15 years ? Mine work great since 2015 and expect them to last beyond 2030
You have to take them down to shingle your roof every 15 years (either insurance will make you do it in FL or you are taking your chances with storms). You cannot sell them after 15 years like you can an investment. They don't have resale value, and the terminal value is zero, so you cannot slap an ROI on the purchase like it's an investment.
 
If I could get solar here for $16k, I'd already have it. The return is more complicated to calculate, because your panels are basically worth zero after 15 years and your shingles need replaced (in Florida good luck making much past 15 years)

Are you sure? Every home I found with Tesla Solar on them (not a lot) went above asking significantly here in SF Bay Area. Further, I sold a home with a wall charger and that was one of the bigger reasons my old home was bought a year ago (the new buyer has a Tesla and didn't want to go through the hassle of installation - they'd lived in condos before).

 
Former justice of the Delaware Supreme Court says yesterday's vote won't do the trick. Pretty shocking. I need to read the original ruling; apparently the amount of Musk's payday is so egregious to her, she's gonna throw it out no matter what. At least according to this person.

I hope this isn't behind paywall:

Bad news/FUD for Tesla is always free even from Bloomberg and WSJ ;)
 
Maybe ARKK worked with some insiders at Tesla? Maybe Elon sent employees to help them start the last pump, and this is the beginning of the next pump?
Or maybe Elon is just optimistic and he likes ARK Invest's rather rosy outlook. By simply referring to their targets, he avoids making his own predictions and the scrutiny that would invite.
 
Um. Please take that back?

The SO and I had 9 kW of amorphous silicon cells installed on the roof in mid 2008. Total max output power (not normally hit, the sun has to be at just the right angle on a clear day) is 7.8 kW using two inverters.

There was some fump-de-dump with the bureaucracy, so the actual, "We're getting all the bells and whistles" on SRECs and such didn't kick in until early 2009.

It's now 2024. The panels are doing their things; on a non-completely-clear day I observed the larger inverter chugging along at 4.5 kW out of 4.8kW max and the smaller inverter (3kW) at 2.5 kW. Not bad.

The SO and I get about 12 MW-hr/year out of the things. In New Jersey, on the program we are grandfathered into, we get an SREC (Solar Renewable Energy Credit) for every MW-hr generated by the panels; at this time, they're worth $198 on the spot market. That'll end for us at the fifteen year mark in October. We'll then switch over to a different SREC system that gets us $25/MW-hr of energy generated.

Just so we're clear: The SRECs are for energy generated by grid-tied inverters; it's not how much is delivered to the power company.

Being connected to the grid sets us back about $4.95/month. On the other hand, we seem to have a surplus of around 2 MW-hr/year, some of which goes into moving the Teslas around. With Net Metering, a tariff that carries excess energy generation forward from month to month, we earn about $150-$250 a year as a generator, selling energy to PSE&G wholesale. With Net Metering, if the carried-forward amount goes to zero, then we pay retail, just like everybody else.

The net effect, though, is that we seriously haven't paid for electricity since fall of 2008. Really.

About once every couple of years I get up on the roof with one of those long-handled window washer sticks and a bucket and clean the whole business off.

Now, we're using amorphous silicon cells. When one looks at these, they're blue, but kind of mottled looking. At the time of install, these were far cheaper than crystalline panels, which look a flat, dead blue/black. Crystalline panels are also lots more efficient, so one needs fewer of them to reach a given energy generation goal.

Finally: Back when we did this, the approved technology method of the time had one hooking up panels in long strings, putting those strings in parallel, and then feeding the whole conglomeration into a DC->AC inverter that generates 240 VAC. So, for example, one part of the roof has three strings of seven panels each, with each of those strings wired in parallel, for a total of 21 panels. This goes to one inverter. The other set are two strings of 11 panels, also wired in parallel, which goes to the other inverter. So the inverters see incoming voltage and current that ranges from Zero/Zero to some maximum voltage and current, then back to 0/0 at night. Turns out that all of the above is relatively inefficient, since panels have manufacturing variations, resulting in some strings having higher voltages/power than other strings that they're in parallel with; as a result, with 9 kW on the roof, we only get 7.8 kW out, max, for an 86% efficiency.

Modern systems put a DC-DC converter on the back of each panel; one side of the DC-DC is hooked up to the actual solar panel. The other side is wired in series with, roughly, ten other panels. Software communicating between the converters in a string like this fixes the output voltage of a string to 300V. Since the secondaries of the DC-DC converters all have the same current (they're wired in series), those panels with more power than other panels end up having more than ~30V across the secondary, while those with less power have less than ~30V, but with the total assembly always having 300V. Additional strings of ten can then be wired in parallel with the first string so connected, so the whole assembly is at 300V; and that fixed 300V is then fed into a more-or-less fixed input voltage inverter, or inverter/battery box (this is what a Tesla PowerWall is), that converts to 240 VAC. Efficiency of this kind of system is over 90, more than making up for any losses in the DC-DC converters.

Main point, though: This system is still going strong at 14.8 years. When do I expect that the whole business, inverters and all, are going to die?

By the by: The whole business was paid off within six years of the install. At this point, the SRECs are just gravy.
I don't live in NJ. Where I live solar install is expensive. Where I live a roof lasts 15 years. An investment can be sold in the future, solar panels cannot. Therefore ROI cannot simply be stated as the amount saved per year divided by the install cost. You must factor in a terminal value of zero. I've never seen anyone selling used solar equipment.
 
Can confirm what @uscbucsfan is saying. Last night i switched to white interior on my awd FS and within an hr I received a VIN. Submitted financing info and waiting for the greenlight to lock in a delivery date now
I switched to grey last month on a 3/24 order date. I'm sure I would have mine by now if I stayed with white (Apr-June was delivery date, grey pushed it to jul-sept). Now that FS is coming to an end, hopefully I can delay until then. I already waited since a 1/9 invite, so I see no reason to pay $20k extra when FS is over soon and likely has little demand left
 
I'd not sweat it as the premise is wrong. FSD of any kind will never be 100% intervention free because chaos.
This is very elegant actually. When FSD gets stick, even if it is once in 10^89 miles, Tesla need a way to intervene.

Simple and elegant and nothingburger.
I think you misunderstood my premise.

I was saying that Tesla's robotaxi network will need fleet monitoring, but they apparently haven't started working on that yet. So I'm a little disappointed that Tesla is not further along.

It's OK. There is plenty of time. I just thought they would have more of the back end infrastructure already worked out.
 
  • Helpful
Reactions: GOVA
I am always struck by what my fellow "shareholders" don't ask. So no one in that room was curious about future products or a clarification ? What about the van seen in the slide? Instead concerned about factory tours for kids?

Its why I left after Elon finished his presentation. It's hard to take that group of "shareholders" seriously.
It's because Tesla invites the same fanboys over and over and not large shareholders. Like the Austin cheerleader from Borat's country that wasted mic time on congratulating the supreme leader.
 
  • Like
Reactions: replicant and gene
Former justice of the Delaware Supreme Court says yesterday's vote won't do the trick. Pretty shocking. I need to read the original ruling; apparently the amount of Musk's payday is so egregious to her, she's gonna throw it out no matter what. At least according to this person.

I hope this isn't behind paywall:

Shocking? Several of us have been telling you this for weeks.
 
We all expected highland to get megacastings.
Yet it didn't happen.

We all expected the next lower priced model would be a new ground-up design.
Yet Elon canceled that plan as to not make finacial sense at this time... "we can make lower priced M3."

I suspect Berlin will make a 2 door hatch version of M3, with a shorter wheelbase and front and rear megacasts.
With maybe some of new tech from CT like 48V.

This being the real reason there are no megacastings in M3HL.., they didn't bother redeveloping the same, they developed something new.

Concept:
View attachment 1056463
It's almost like Tesla doesn't understand the car market. We don't all want/need the same cars. How hard can it be to do this with the S and 3 and also a 2-door?
 
I understand, but most of the questions were good tho.
I always love the variability in us humans. I found the questions to be embarrassing, especially at the start. I am happy with how all the voting went but there are so few chances to put questions directly to Elon and we got so little of substance. While I like Elon, any 'thank you for being you' statements are a waste of time. Elon (Tesla) is so mentally in on FSD now I really think the company only cares about the current lineup of cars insomuch as it pays for FSD development. Lots of talk on that but a telling moment for me was at 2:05:40 of the official stream. It is where his Tesla time goes and he is nervous about it. One tough problem problem to solve to say the least.
 
Are you sure? Every home I found with Tesla Solar on them (not a lot) went above asking significantly here in SF Bay Area. Further, I sold a home with a wall charger and that was one of the bigger reasons my old home was bought a year ago (the new buyer has a Tesla and didn't want to go through the hassle of installation - they'd lived in condos before).

I'm in a different area, mostly MAGA, so solar isn't moving the needle here and most installers are out of town. I'm also in real estate for 25 years building spec homes and fixing and flipping, and I can say unless you have an A-B test it would be impossible to say this exact house would have sold for this much more with 'x' or it sold for this much less bc it didn't have 'y'.
It's also why median prices to judge housing inflation is misleading. Maybe this years median house is newer, bigger, nicer and more valuable compared to last years salesa. I look to same house sales, and prices peaked in 2022 (in my area at least) and most houses listed that sold post covid are not going to lose money (again, in my tourist area)
 
Elon (Tesla) is so mentally in on FSD now I really think the company only cares about the current lineup of cars insomuch as it pays for FSD development.
I think that's probably true. And frankly, I'm very happy about it.

It is where his Tesla time goes and he is nervous about it. One tough problem problem to solve to say the least.
Oh yes. It's a very tough problem to solve. If it was easy, anyone could do it and Tesla would not have its enormous advantage.

I'm glad to be investing in the company that will solve autonomy. It will save lives, lower emissions, and make us shareholders wealthy.
 
Former justice of the Delaware Supreme Court says yesterday's vote won't do the trick. Pretty shocking. I need to read the original ruling; apparently the amount of Musk's payday is so egregious to her, she's gonna throw it out no matter what. At least according to this person.

I hope this isn't behind paywall:

So corrupt. It’s not even about the law, it’s just moving goalposts because a single person completely unrelated to the company arbitrarily decides they think it’s “too much” compensation that owners of a company have now twice attempted to pay their employee. They’re not even trying to hide it. Good riddance, Delaware. We can just vote a 3rd time after moving to TX.
 
All that may be, but the numbers just don’t work out for me and Gator. For starters we can’t expect that longevity as roofs need frequent replacing — often at the insistence of the insurance company. Then there are hurricanes. Add in that we can buy solar power from FPL and the incentive disappears. Also in my case, I am very tax efficient and cannot use the tax write off..
Um. Your situation is your situation, of course, but let me point out a couple-three things.

Back in the day when the house was being built, the SO and I, both engineers, sat down with a few web-based tools (njcleanenergy.com, at the time), figured out how big a set of panels and inverters we'd need to power the house. This was back in 2004. Although there were incentives from places, we didn't know a Thing About Them, so just ran with how much we'd save on electricity. Careful calculation revealed that it would take fifteen (15) years. We might have done it anyway, but the builder had a covenant in the contract: No "ugly" additions until two years after the last building got sold. So, we sighed and went our way.

2008 rolled around and we ended up at a home show. Solar was still expensive, but (a) the State of NJ was throwing in 20% of the cost as an incentive and (b) the Feds then, as now, was throwing in 30% of the remainder as a Tax Credit. (That's not a deduction: Whatever you owed in taxes, you simply reduced that by 30% of the cost of the solar system. And if you hit zero (which we did), you get to use the excess that you didn't use in the following years, for as many years as it took. That was nice.

In addition, there was (c), this Solar Renewable Energy Credit. One got one of these for every MW-hr of energy generated by the panels, whether or not the energy thus created went to the power company or not: The only requirements were (a) it had to be a grid-tied system (no free-standers, thank-you-very-much) and, in NJ, the calculated total amount of energy generated per year had to be less than or equal to the previous amount of energy sucked down from the power company. (That was put in there so power companies wouldn't go broke.)

The SRECs are.. interesting. By public law:
  • A power utility in the state was required to generate a certain percentage of their power by "green" means. For every MW-hr of energy that they missed by, they would have to pay something called a "SICL" payment to the State.
    • The percentage would go up year on year.
    • The SICL payment amount would go down year on year.
  • The utility could pay that SICL payment - or they could hand the State an SREC. The SRECs were tradable. There's a platform called GATS that, amongst other things like controlling power flows across most of the eastern half of the nation, they handled the creation, sale, and retirement of these SRECs.
  • Initial percentages were in the low single digits, now in the medium double-digits. SICLs started off, I think, around $800/MW-hr; they're now around $220. Small companies would scurry around and get SRECs from homeowners and the like, buy them, and sell then en masse to the utilities, for less than the SICL payments.
As a result, in the first year, the SO and I were getting $600 or so per SREC. We're getting around $198 now. The SRECs continue for fifteen years after the solar installation.

Now, the funny bit: Back in 2008, an installed solar system was about $8000 per kW of solar panel on the roof. As I said, without the incentives, paying that off in reduced electric bills would take about fifteen years. The last time I checked, that number is now about $2000 per kW of solar panel on the roof - a factor of four reduction, not including inflation.

For that reason, the original SREC program was discontinued in NJ years ago: No more grants. And, while there is a bit of an SREC program, it pays far, far less then the old one.

If it took, using prices (and lower electric bills) back in the day 15 years, with a factor of four reduction in cost, it's going to take less than four years. Even better, the cost of electricity has gone up with inflation - so it'll take even less time to break even.

That's nice for those that have the capital to just Do The Install, which, as you noted, is around $20k for you. But it gets better.

Say one takes out a home improvement loan for a solar panel system for, say, ten years or something. Home improvement loans are backed up by the collateral of the house; as such, they're generally low risk to lenders and get mortgage rates for interest. Do the calculations: The Home Improvement Loan amounts will be about 1/2 the cost of the electricity that one isn't paying for. This means that one is cash-flow-positive, from Day One. And, come the day that the loan is paid off.. Well, it's a-gonna take one whopper of a connection fee from the electric company to wreck them apples.

As far as hurricanes and such.. We asked about that. Building standards in NJ have lag bolts going into the attic rafters; they claimed that it was good for >120 mph winds, which is the same number for roofs in general up here. We don't get much in the way of hurricanes, although Sandy was fun, but Northeasters are a way of life up here, so we do get 70-80 mph winds from time to time.

As far as wear and tear on the roof: Well, it's a south facing roof where the panels are and, as near as I can tell, the panels are protecting the roof shingles. From sunlight. Which does wear out asphalt tiles.

We do get significant snow up this way; there's been up to a foot and some of snow on the roof from time to time. Interestingly, given the least amount of above-freezing weather, the glass on the solar panels kind of melts the bottom most layer of snow, and the whole mess just up and avalanches off the roof, shaking the house and deck behind the house. We lost one deck table that way from a couple hundred pounds of snow falling a couple stories. But we start getting electricity right afterwards, no problems.

Had one (1) leak, about four years in. In NJ, to be in the whole solar installation business with the SRECs and all, everything had to be warrantied for 15 years. So the guys showed up, saw the leak where I pointed it out, got on the roof, moved panels around, and fixed it. Dry since then.

I dunno. There's not a heck of a lot of argument against solar panel systems. Money in one's pocket and all that.