It appears Tesla lowered the Model S & X price by $2k. No change on the Model 3 though.
Helping to compensate for the $1875 drop in the US federal tax credit on July 1st.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It appears Tesla lowered the Model S & X price by $2k. No change on the Model 3 though.
So what's the new bear/short narrative, I suppose profit, right?
It appears Tesla lowered the Model S & X price by $2k. No change on the Model 3 though.
Wow, that is disappointing. Dealership associations apparently don't discriminate by political party when making donations. We have the same issue in New York... Tesla is limited to 5 stores.Wisconsin at it once again:https://www.bizjournals.com/milwauk...get-includes-tax-cut-and-funding-for-zoo.html
Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers revealed his version of the state budget Wednesday that includes funds to complete the Zoo Interchange freeway project and cuts to income taxes for “Wisconsin’s working families.”
Evers used his veto power to make it easier for the Medical College of Wisconsin to proceed with its proposed $100 million cancer research center and to block Republicans’ plan to allow Tesla to sell vehicles directly to consumers.
.
.
.
The Tesla legislation was controversial after some news coverage said Republicans added it to the budget to win a crucial vote from a Republican state senator.
Evers said he objected to the proposal because it would cause significant changes in the state’s existing motor vehicle dealership law and the consumer protections it provides. He also said the provision was included in the budget without “adequate public input and debate.”
Might just be offsetting the tax credit change. If so that suggests that the model 3 is popular enough that it doesn't need a price change to offset the credit.Refresh coming?
Might just be offsetting the tax credit change. If so that suggests that the model 3 is popular enough that it doesn't need a price change to offset the credit.
I see no change to the price on the S LR. I can't speak about SR or Performance as I don't know what the price was before.It appears Tesla lowered the Model S & X price by $2k. No change on the Model 3 though.
It appears Tesla lowered the Model S & X price by $2k. No change on the Model 3 though.
I see no change to the price on the S LR. I can't speak about SR or Performance as I don't know what the price was before.
The credit is not big help long term.
A car maker gets a $5,625 head start on Tesla, until they sell 200k cars at which point their advantage goes away over 5 quarters or so. At which point they have no benefit against Tesla. Meanwhile, Tesla keeps improving their cars while the typical OEM is locked into model years.
One possible version of the simulation:
While good for the planet and citizens as a whole, this will be bad for my region and autoworkers in general:
Tesla has won.
They have the cars people want, the know how and equipment to build them, and the desire to do so. Even if other OEMs catch up on tech, they cannot catch up on price due to automation and existing fiscal responsibilities.
Elon's facepalm will be from them not moving soon enough, but he will achieve the master plan. Car sales being 50% EV (on the way to 100%) is a win, even if total sales are only 2.25x Tesla's output.
Overall, less cars being built is better for the environment also (assuming existing get retired before their emissions get bad)
Capitalism can't because there is no money in fighting Tesla. They are too far ahead of the price reduction curve. The best others can do is imitate and come in at a higher price point which is only relevant due to scarcity. And even then, only until Tesla adds another plant. (Other than non-Tesla body styles that fill unmet needs).
The best glide slope is national subsidies on EV and taxes on ICE to push people into buying non-Teslas now thus funding other OEM development programs. Even then, there will be industrial carnage. (Marco Capitalism perhaps?)
A positive p/e ratio would tempt a great deal of conservative investors/funds into the fray.Other than SP500 inclusion, do profits matter? I personally think not, I'm more interested at sustaining growth and bringing the MY, MP, R2 and semi to production.
One of UK's (less prestigious, I accept) news-papers raving about Model 3 safety...
Tesla Model 3 sets new safety technology benchmark in Euro NCAP testing
One thing I haven't seen discussed (but with this thread it's easy to miss stuff) is that there are a number of BEV startups such as Rivian and Lucid that need staff experienced in building electric cars and the best place to find them is Tesla! There is no wonder a fair amount of poaching is going on because I'm certain those companies are willing to offer big pay increases and stock options and regardless of how loyal they may have been to Tesla, money talks! I don't know if there are non-compete clauses in their employment agreements, but it doesn't appear there is much of one.I thought Gene (bull guy...) had some good points, and basically said something similar (high pressure, should be easier going forward), and there has been a few fairly important people that have left in the last year. I personally don't see it as that big of a deal but it is a valid point.
Not sure where that (margin concerns) come from,
One thing I haven't seen discussed (but with this thread it's easy to miss stuff) is that there are a number of BEV startups such as Rivian and Lucid that need staff that are experienced in building electric cars and the best place to find them is Tesla! There is no wonder there is a fair amount of poaching going on because I'm certain those companies are willing to offer big pay increases and stock options and regardless of how loyal they may have been to Tesla, money talks! I don't know if there are non-compete clauses in their employment agreement, but it doesn't appear there is much of one.
All this talk about people jumping a sinking ship at Tesla is just a lot of hooey in my opinion, as supply and demand also applies in the work world and folks that have worked at Tesla are worth their weight in gold-pressed latinum. All in all, it will probably be good for Tesla in the long run, as competition makes for better and less expensive products, plus it helps achieve Tesla's goals of accelerating the use of BEV's worldwide.
I find the pole impact quite impressive. Not much intrusion.