Well I am still with Fidelity so no recommendation...yet.Ooof. I have Fidelity. Which company do you like?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well I am still with Fidelity so no recommendation...yet.Ooof. I have Fidelity. Which company do you like?
Strawberry Fields Forever was released on February 17, 1967...which was a Friday...
FINRA Short Selling Report for Wed, Sep 02, 2020
"Short Exempt Volume" a.k.a. Market Maker's naked shorting was 7.23% of "Short Volume", which ranks at the 90th Percentile (very unlikely to occur by chance).
Note in the table below that last week had historically low levels of Naked Shorting: Avg was 0.63% for the week
View attachment 583693
The SP was down -14.7% intraday today after triggering the 'Uptick Rule'. Market Makers and Hedge Funds routinely flaunt SEC rules by exploiting their exemption to naked short selling for Options market makers (SEC Regulation SHO).
Especially note that today's level of naked short selling was predicted in advance due to the mechanism of Options Market Makers being used by Hedge Funds to exploit Regulation SHO to manipulate TSLA's share price.
Certain members of this forum seem unaware that the value of a theory is in its ability to predict events. Today's FINRA data strengthens the theory that Naked Short Selling is being used to manipulate TSLA.
This is NOT new. It has been discussed on this forum for years. It is just now that certain members are beginning to understand these mechanisms and take the issue seriously. THIS MATTERS. Over $25B of Shareholder value was extracted from the Market today by Hedge Funds via exploiting SEC Regulation SHO.
Prediction for tomorrow: Thu Sep 03, 2020
#SEC #BROKENREGSHO
- With 'Uptick Rule' in effect, Naked Short Selling will be in the 7-9% range as reported by FINRA
- the Report Data at this link will become available tomorrow after 3:30 PM EDT, Sep 03, 2020
Under the rule, an order can be marked “long” when the seller owns the security being sold and the security either is in the physical possession or control of the broker-dealer, or it is reasonably expected that the security will be in the physical possession or control of the broker or dealer no later than settlement. However, if a person does not own the security, or owns the security sold but it is not reasonably expected that the security will be in the possession or control of the broker-dealer prior to settlement, the sale should be marked “short.” The sale could be marked “short exempt” if the seller is entitled to rely on an exception from the short sale price test circuit breaker.
- Rule 201 – Short Sale Price Test Circuit Breaker. Rule 201 generally requires trading centers to establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to prevent the execution or display of a short sale at an impermissible price when a stock has triggered a circuit breaker by experiencing a price decline of at least 10 percent in one day. Once the circuit breaker in Rule 201 has been triggered, the price test restriction will apply to short sale orders in that security for the remainder of the day and the following day, unless an exception applies.
This leaves me with the option to spend it all and honestly, it’s getting exhausting thinking up all the ways in which to spend it considering my life experience and aspirations
It’s the really young kids like 5-12 who point at my M3. One today was maybe 6/7 and tugging at his granddad to look ! I’m in Ireland. These are the future and it’s great to see
TD Ameritrade has matched the $0 transaction fee of Robinhood but not the fractional shares functionality. So my reaction is the stockbroker equivalent of Standards
If you feeling a little down about the last few days here is a little pick ya up.
I think battery day will be seen in a different context to autonomy day, which tanked the stock, and I’m not selling into the event.
Although Autonomy Day produced a downward trend in the stock, TSLA was being valued on fundamentals. In this context, the vague presentation of the business case disinclined analysts and institutions to take it seriously. Dan Galves, in his interview with Tesla Daily said he was spooked by Elon saying that autonomy was basically their “entire expense structure”. Also, Elon presented the business case in a few slides at the end of the day, using $1/mile as a price that he had just picked out of the air.
Now the price is including more of the future value. In this context the battery day information increases the certainty of the business case, where battery supply is the critical path. Solving battery supply also opens up the battery storage side of the business to expand alongside vehicles, rather than in competition with the vehicle business for resources. So there is a potential upside to valuation there, or at least better support for current valuation (without relying on autonomy).
Will there be any surprises at Battery Day? If not, it should be priced in already.
How can it be priced in when nobody knows what the economics are yet?Will there be any surprises at Battery Day? If not, it should be priced in already.
I was born 9 months after the release of this song. I'm ready for the spoon now, please.Strawberry Fields Forever was released on February 17, 1967...which was a Friday...
Since you say that "today's level of naked short selling was predicted in advance" perhaps you can point to the post where that was predicted, along with some notion of what it would do to the stock price. Me, I don't care about this at all if it has no effect on the stock price.FINRA Short Selling Report for Wed, Sep 02, 2020
"Short Exempt Volume" a.k.a. Market Maker's naked shorting was 7.23% of "Short Volume", which ranks at the 90th Percentile (very unlikely to occur by chance).
Note in the table below that last week had historically low levels of Naked Shorting: Avg was 0.63% for the week
View attachment 583693
The SP was down -14.7% intraday today after triggering the 'Uptick Rule'. Market Makers and Hedge Funds routinely flaunt SEC rules by exploiting their exemption to naked short selling for Options market makers (SEC Regulation SHO).
Especially note that today's level of naked short selling was predicted in advance due to the mechanism of Options Market Makers being used by Hedge Funds to exploit Regulation SHO to manipulate TSLA's share price.
Certain members of this forum seem unaware that the value of a theory is in its ability to predict events. Today's FINRA data strengthens the theory that Naked Short Selling is being used to manipulate TSLA.
This is NOT new. It has been discussed on this forum for years. It is just now that certain members are beginning to understand these mechanisms and take the issue seriously. THIS MATTERS. Over $25B of Shareholder value was extracted from the Market today by Hedge Funds via exploiting SEC Regulation SHO.
Prediction for tomorrow: Thu Sep 03, 2020
#SEC #BROKENREGSHO
- With 'Uptick Rule' in effect, Naked Short Selling will be in the 7-9% range as reported by FINRA
- the Report Data at this link will become available tomorrow after 3:30 PM EDT, Sep 03, 2020
I found this page on the S&P site regarding methodology. Near the bottom are a bunch of spreadsheets, one of which is the rebalancing calendar for equity indexes. Here's a snapshot:
View attachment 583673
If I'm reading that right, the actual file with the new balances for the 9/18 rebalancing is sent to SPG's customers after the close on 9/4. I assume any related additions/removals would be announced at the same time.
Note that announcements related to the previous rebalancing (6/19) were made on 6/12, the date listed for the proforma file in that calendar. Note also that both the June and December windows are one week between proforma and effective dates, but the window for September is two weeks.
First time I've seen this document. If it's sitting right there, I must admit to being somewhat mystified that all the "experts" discussing this haven't simply pointed to it. Of course, weeks ago it wouldn't mean that they would wait until rebalancing to announce inclusion, but at this point that seems extremely likely. And it doesn't seem as though they can leave it for after rebalancing either.If you found this, the big boys know about it. So, might expect two more days of SP suppression to 1) lower the starting point for the infinity squeeze, and 2) shake loose shares (increase float).
Same thing, I guess.
It’s the really young kids like 5-12 who point at my M3. One today was maybe 6/7 and tugging at his granddad to look ! I’m in Ireland. These are the future and it’s great to see
Yeah, the kids in my neighbourhood are the same. They wave, or sometimes pump their fists. You can tell the really young ones, like 6 or 7, have heard the older ones talking - for them it's like seeing a spaceship.
You'd have plenty of time to load up on super cheap shares before the price explodes again.Yeah I'm not fine with Tesla doing 100+ billion in annual revenue while being valued between 250 and 450 billion
With 'Uptick Rule' in effect, Naked Short Selling will be in the 7-9% range as reported by FINRA