SebastianR
Active Member
Alright, now we know more. I don't get why we are $50 lower than after Q3 but then again - markets are not always rationale.
Overall I think this was the most solid / carefully sandbagged ER / letter I have read from Tesla so far. Much of the info was already known so we got solid re-affirmation on many items. I hope the nonsense about "cash needed to serve debt obligations" is settled now. I don't think that the demand issue is settled for Wall St. (it is for me) and I have a hunch this is where most legacy analysts will play catch-up over the coming years. I think they still believe EVs are a slower moving transition / short-term fad that will be killed in the next recession.
Overall: with Tesla needing Wall St. no longer (which I don't think that the analysts got - see also the questions on where funds for CapEx is supposed to come from), I don't think Tesla will spend a lot of efforts to maintain TSLA. If the shorts realise this early, pack and go I think we will see TSLA rise quickly over the coming months - especially if more legacy car makers are struggling. If shorts / FUDsters don't realise this, they will have a field day for the next half year at least. This could be quite painful/ugly for us longs... I don't think it will be ugly for the coming years if Tesla keeps executing.
EDIT: the CFO transition makes sense if you believe the above is true. They don't need a big name, well connected, CFO Rockstar that knows half of Wall St. They need to have somebody who geeks out over costs, knows Tesla, can drive efficiency programmes and knows "how it is done" in the company. In fact, I would be worried with external talent in this role now. Tesla is self-funding going forward. But I doubt that is a realisation the market has made yet.
Thoughts?
Overall I think this was the most solid / carefully sandbagged ER / letter I have read from Tesla so far. Much of the info was already known so we got solid re-affirmation on many items. I hope the nonsense about "cash needed to serve debt obligations" is settled now. I don't think that the demand issue is settled for Wall St. (it is for me) and I have a hunch this is where most legacy analysts will play catch-up over the coming years. I think they still believe EVs are a slower moving transition / short-term fad that will be killed in the next recession.
Overall: with Tesla needing Wall St. no longer (which I don't think that the analysts got - see also the questions on where funds for CapEx is supposed to come from), I don't think Tesla will spend a lot of efforts to maintain TSLA. If the shorts realise this early, pack and go I think we will see TSLA rise quickly over the coming months - especially if more legacy car makers are struggling. If shorts / FUDsters don't realise this, they will have a field day for the next half year at least. This could be quite painful/ugly for us longs... I don't think it will be ugly for the coming years if Tesla keeps executing.
EDIT: the CFO transition makes sense if you believe the above is true. They don't need a big name, well connected, CFO Rockstar that knows half of Wall St. They need to have somebody who geeks out over costs, knows Tesla, can drive efficiency programmes and knows "how it is done" in the company. In fact, I would be worried with external talent in this role now. Tesla is self-funding going forward. But I doubt that is a realisation the market has made yet.
Thoughts?
Last edited: