gringotuanis
Member
It will be true when they pay $1 billion off on March 1."Within 10 days, Tesla has decreased their debt with almost a billion $"
Is this statement true?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It will be true when they pay $1 billion off on March 1."Within 10 days, Tesla has decreased their debt with almost a billion $"
Is this statement true?
Can you even cross most US cities to work and back on EPA 83 miles? LolView attachment 379156
2 seater with 83 miles of range(not EPA certified yet) and top speed of 65 mph.
I wouldn't pay $10k for that. Much less $19,999 and wait for Fed Tax Credit.
Pretty sure thats not killing any Tesla’s...
Can one of these things tow another to extend the mileage?Well, you can get 3 of them for the same price and have triple redundancy ?
Well - 100k+ people have been driving 24 kwh Leafs for years. So, yes.Can you even cross most US cities to work and back on EPA 83 miles? Lol
There' a chance that the current state of AP might be quickly advanced by HW3, which is a pre-req for FSD.I thought those were very fair observations by that analyst. He gave credit to the current AP being the most advanced available, and he is skeptical of getting full FSD in 12 to 18 months. Which I am sure most here would agree is an aggressive timeline with the current state of AP.
Well - 100k+ people have been driving 24 kwh Leafs for years. So, yes.
ps : (Leaf '11 was 74 miles EPA, '13 was 83.)
Demand-related risks from ExxonMobil 10-K: “...changes in technology or consumer preferences that alter fuel choices, such as technological advances in energy storage that make wind and solar more competitive for power generation or increased consumer demand for alternative fueled or electric vehicles; and broad-based changes in personal income levels.”
Nope - definitely they have to sell SR in the US. It can start with SR+PUP for $39k, for sure. It would be bad PR if they sell SR first in China before US.
They are almost there, selling MR+PUP for $42k. So, SR+PUP for $39k should be possible.
We haven’t seen Model Y prices, obviously, but it’s probably important to remember that the floor is much higher for mid-size SUVs. It could be close enough in price to directly compete with non-luxury brands in that segment.
Maybe the more important thing to remember is the Tesla mission and that Elon is well aware of price sensitive human beings. He’ll price the Model Y (and the pickup) at the lowest price points Tesla can afford.
It is so frustrating that every car "competes" with Tesla, but there is complete denial that Tesla is taking away ICE purchases. Samsung just released a bunch of new phones today and AAPL is up. But you know if Ford, GM or Honda released some new crappy shoebox SUV due out in 2025 the press would be shouting "Tesla killer".
Until an accident happens. We demand the kind of accuracy from machines that humans can't even dream of and are never asked to prove. We have already seen that with Uber. If a human caused that accident, it wouldn't be news.urther, I think the regulatory and insurance environment will prove much more compliant and responsive than most seem to be expecting.
May be we are talking somewhat different timelines.Yeah just like the $50k Model S. The point is that Tesla has more demand for MR+ then it can fulfill so why ever make more then a small run of SR?
Corporate Counsel has a profile of Tesla's new GC, Jonathan Chang, up here -- it's very positive.
Highlights:
- Been with Tesla since April 2011.
- Described as very "respected" within the company.
- Been involved with many aspects of the company's legal department; played a "key role" in the SolarCity acquisition and early payoff of Dept. of Energy loan.
- Described as someone who will bring "stability" to the legal department.
You would literally have to pay me to own that thing.View attachment 379156
2 seater with 83 miles of range(not EPA certified yet) and top speed of 65 mph.
I wouldn't pay $10k for that. Much less $19,999 and wait for Fed Tax Credit.
May be we are talking somewhat different timelines.
SR is needed for Tesla to continue selling 400k 3s a year. Infact most of those might be SR, rather than MR. Also, I'm not even sure why you think they can definitely sell 150k MR+ in NA.
BTW, that $50k Model S is the reason Musk has to make a $35k 3.