He's changed his Twitter name to Tusk because he wanted to start some Rumours.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
He's changed his Twitter name to Tusk because he wanted to start some Rumours.
Who knows what it means, but just a thought: ET = Electric Truck? And ET phone home = start of Electric semi Truck production at new home = Lathrop?
Pezpunk
Active Member
Tesla Updated Super Charger (TUSC)
mltv
Member
Maybe Elon just want to prove to the judge that tweeting numbers really does not move the market by comparing with these latest vague tweet.
Antares Nebula
Active Member
This is incredibly reminiscent of LEMUR. What was the market reaction to that? Will need to go back and look.
This kinda shows you the ball is still in Tesla's court, they're in full control. They have on demand hype anytime they want to grab attention and get people excited. They can generate demand at anytime, and they have many projects in the works that we don't even know about. If they aren't showing us something, that's because they don't need to.
Is it 2pm Thursday yet?
Is it 2pm Thursday yet?
The timing here has made it difficult to suss out whether the price action is more related to the announcement or the imminent bond payment.
So take me to school here because
a. I am not an American and don't know much about the "SEC"
b. not sure whats constitutes "norms" re announcements like this.
Is the CEO of a company allowed to tweet something like Elon did? So , no news, just that there is going to be news. With the hate that American society in general has for Elon, is even a simple tweet like this not inviting even more prosecution? Can't the "SEC" see this as stock manipulation?
Frankly it all seems bizarre but kinda curious.
a. I am not an American and don't know much about the "SEC"
b. not sure whats constitutes "norms" re announcements like this.
Is the CEO of a company allowed to tweet something like Elon did? So , no news, just that there is going to be news. With the hate that American society in general has for Elon, is even a simple tweet like this not inviting even more prosecution? Can't the "SEC" see this as stock manipulation?
Frankly it all seems bizarre but kinda curious.
Antares Nebula
Active Member
trailhound
Member
This is going to be an announcement not a reveal. IMO
How about a partnership on Daimler Sprinter or Semi?
I would love it if Tesla let some other company help with the Mission. So that Tesla can keep their focus on one or two products at a time.
I guess they could be taking over a factory that is being vacated.
we will know in a little over 24...
trailhound
way overweight tsla
How about a partnership on Daimler Sprinter or Semi?
I would love it if Tesla let some other company help with the Mission. So that Tesla can keep their focus on one or two products at a time.
I guess they could be taking over a factory that is being vacated.
we will know in a little over 24...
trailhound
way overweight tsla
MartinAustin
Active Member
OK so CNBC finally showed a TSLA chart.
Of course it is "year to date" so today's +5% is disguised by a fall from January 1st... smh
They are apparently going to cover the debt repayment issue. I expect they have been working all day on how to frame it negatively.
Of course it is "year to date" so today's +5% is disguised by a fall from January 1st... smh
They are apparently going to cover the debt repayment issue. I expect they have been working all day on how to frame it negatively.
My take is that the 420 tweet was a huge goof. This latest one is somebody wanting to make a point and taking the most severe interpretation possible. The idea is that a CEO can't just make up stuff in order to manipulate stock.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
