You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
99% of crashes involving humans in charge cannot truly be categorized as "accidents", IMO.People drive aggressively because they are mentally or emotionally unstable in the moment. Yes, they are.
In a hurry because they didn’t get out of bed early enough, didn’t allow enough travel time, irritated by the task they are going to, too much going on in the day because they’ve overbooked, stressed about (fill in the blank), think they own the road and have no regard for all the other humans and on and on and on the list goes.
Some people are having epiphanies IN Teslas WHILE driving. I’ve shared a couple of those stories here as have others. The car is showing them a different way to live and view life. The car is giving them driving enjoyment that they’ve never felt before or cared about before. Yes, that is happening.
I contend the car is plenty aggressive and that it’s every other impatient, angry, rushing person on the road who needs to chill the heck out. NOT that the car/FSD needs to be more aggressive.
I contend that in the end the cautious, perhaps politeness, of FSD and the opportunity for people to take a load off and not have to ‘get up on the wheel’ is the path that should be taken and the end result aimed for. That makes happier people and increases safety on top of the safety garnered by FSD all on its own.
Jaguar CEO on CNBC right now, (paraphrase) "I don't think we'll see the majority of car sales being EVs for at least a couple decades."
Lol....it's almost physically impossible for adoption to slow to that rate. No follow up question of course.
Tough crowd. Ok I’ll sit on my hands, starting now...MODERATOR NOTE:
There are a strangely large number of supremely low-quality posts showing up. Not just people trying to be cute, and not just mischievous posters spreading malice, but real drivel.
If you can't post something of value, sit on your hands, please. If you want a silly chat group, there are plenty of other locations on the internet, so I have been told. Real comic relief - to an extent - always is welcome.
And in case you haven't noticed....I'm back.
Jaguar CEO on CNBC right now, (paraphrase) "I don't think we'll see the majority of car sales being EVs for at least a couple decades."
Lol....it's almost physically impossible for adoption to slow to that rate. No follow up question of course.
Mondays event is at 11 am PST as confirmed by davet
Thank you. I'm just trying to keep the FUD in check here. Getting pretty thick.MODERATOR NOTE:
There are a strangely large number of supremely low-quality posts showing up. Not just people trying to be cute, and not just mischievous posters spreading malice, but real drivel.
If you can't post something of value, sit on your hands, please. If you want a silly chat group, there are plenty of other locations on the internet, so I have been told. Real comic relief - to an extent - always is welcome.
And in case you haven't noticed....I'm back.
You're paranoid, I'm not anthonyj
Just check my postings history.
95% bullish and sometimes overemotional![]()
CNBC is really pumping that Jaguar just one Best Green Car at the New York Auto Show. Of course they leave out one minor detail - Tesla wasn't there which apparently means they don't qualify.
Jaguar I-Pace electric SUV sweeps awards at New York auto show
Uncle Jack has an idea of contents, last bit of 2 hours:Any word as to when on monday (22nd) the big gala begins ?
IE After market closes ?
I disagree. Track times are per lap, it doesn't matter to me if 5 hard laps aren't possible. If single lap times are comparable, then it's a comparable car.Not true, not yet. Be careful of your assumptions.
Speedwise yes, it may even be better, but battery capacity won't allow you to run 4 hard sessions daily that most clubs let you do. You can do somewhere between 1 and 2.
I evaluated it for this purpose (I go to Mosport frequently) and it was impractical.
It may work for some tracks and some owners, depending on charging infrastructure.
You are correct, a 6% curb weight difference between LR and SR+ should not cause a 6% consumption difference. But note the "test weight" is almost 10% higher for LR. I have no idea why. The 7% city consumption difference lines up with that, but the 6% highway difference doesn't.It seems a greater efficient improvement than I would expect from the reduced weight alone. Perhaps the new pack design has upgraded tech in addition to the lower manufacturing cost.
At least this guy is not malicious. Tesla should not put something in firmware that they don't want to be in the open.
Anyone know why ARKK is down $1.02 (2.17%)?I'm saying Tesla would massacre the competition.
At least this guy is not malicious. Tesla should not put something in firmware that they don't want to be in the open.
Meanwhile, in $TSLAND - look like the MMD is over.
Other than the bear attack at open, looks like we're following Nasdaq with the usual multiplier.
View attachment 397680
I wouldn't worry too much about losing the drunk customers. Every one believes they are totally in control and don't need a ride. The ones without licenses are a concern.So you are think Tesla would exclude the largest part of people using these services? i.e. The ones that don't have a driver's license, so they can't be the safety driver... (Or the ones that are too drunk to drive themselves, etc.)