Oh yeah. Straight into my veins please.
Terrible. Where are you supposed to store anything, with a bed that small? Concepts like this will get you laughed at by most pickup owners.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh yeah. Straight into my veins please.
Or just...
The exact same Model S you can buy today, so that they don't have to change a dang thing, and people can order them immediately, and Tesla's global inventory isn't obsoleted.
Hmm, which to choose, which to choose...
YEAH for track testing at the Ring right now I vote for the current (Raven) Model S. Get the data which should be very good whether it beats the Taycan or not, at a drastically lower price, for a car you can buy right now. Now the staging is set for more improvements that we all know are coming when they are ready.
Yeppers!
Regen (full accelerator lift) + braking.
Could add more regen too.
Is regent something that can just be turned up OTA?
Correct me if I’m wrong, from what I’ve read around the net, the Taycan has a much stronger regen than Teslas (265KW vs ~70kW).
Add that to the fact the pads are probably better, the rotors are a lot bigger on the Taycan, and it comes with 10 piston front calipers in front for the Turbo model. Driving dynamics is Porsche’s forte, efficiency is not. No one buys a Porsche to have an efficient car.
Different target market from the average Tesla buyer.
Its simple: neural networks are not deterministic, so you can't treat them that way. They are probabilistic. Which means what you experience may stay the same, degrade or improve -- all while doing the "same" things. And there is so much variability that no one, not you, not the people you were quoting, no one (outside of Tesla) even has a chance of collecting enough data points to make any statistically meaningful statements.You obviously didn't read my post.
Let me ask this again - without changing NN (because the 2 cars have the same NN) how could their AP behavior be different based on how many times the cars have been driven on a particular route ?
Hmm, ok. I guess my understanding of "synchronous" in this context wasn't correct.This paper discusses them as two distinct types
https://www.researchgate.net/public..._High-Performance_Fault-Tolerant_Applications
If, on average, the performance is improving for a specific car that drives a specific route (the probabilities are shifting), something must be changing. I say local map data.Its simple: neural networks are not deterministic, so you can't treat them that way. They are probabilistic. Which means what you experience may stay the same, degrade or improve -- all while doing the "same" things. And there is so much variability that no one, not you, not the people you were quoting, no one (outside of Tesla) even has a chance of collecting enough data points to make any statistically meaningful statements.
That's too broad a statement. NN is probabilistic - about the same way human perception is. But we can still tell when things are improving.Its simple: neural networks are not deterministic, so you can't treat them that way. They are probabilistic. Which means what you experience may stay the same, degrade or improve -- all while doing the "same" things. And there is so much variability that no one, not you, not the people you were quoting, no one (outside of Tesla) even has a chance of collecting enough data points to make any statistically meaningful statements.
Elon MuskVerified account @elonmusk 20m20 minutes ago
For the remainder of September, Tesla is permanently waiving the $1500 solar removal fee requirement. Note, the ability to stop monthly payments at any time remains.
Looks like Tesla Energy is trying to make some quick "sales".
- Elon MuskVerified account @elonmusk 15m15 minutes ago
Without the removal fee, Tesla Solar is unequivocally a guaranteed, instant money printer, producing $300 to $1000 per year (in after tax income!)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Elon MuskVerified account @elonmusk 20m20 minutes ago
For the remainder of September, Tesla is permanently waiving the $1500 solar removal fee requirement. Note, the ability to stop monthly payments at any time remains.
Looks like Tesla Energy is trying to make some quick "sales".
- Elon MuskVerified account @elonmusk 15m15 minutes ago
Without the removal fee, Tesla Solar is unequivocally a guaranteed, instant money printer, producing $300 to $1000 per year (in after tax income!)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
The solar business was supposed to go from the SolarCity leasing model to cash sales. Now suddenly they are aggressively renting the panels. What gives?
Some news from Elon on Twitter:
V10 won't include smart autopark: Elon Musk on Twitter
Nico Rosberg might drive for Tesla @ Nürburgring: Elon Musk on Twitter
You don't have enough samples to justify any statement like that. For the same reason as some people see regressions while others go "hey, this is miraculous". But hey, its the weekend. I just got done bottling two different meads. Both tasty (and alcoholic, ~13% ABV), both different. Um... topicality? Right! Raven -> Odin -> Norse -> Mjölnir -> runes --- I give them names that are anagrams of rune names. Later this year I'll be able to sip some UK NaanIf, on average, the performance is improving for a specific car that drives a specific route (the probabilities are shifting), something must be changing. I say local map data.
P.S. what do mean this is the investment thread?
The pedal is not constantly floored, even on the track. When power's not going to traction, it's going to compression.
Adding many hundreds of kilowatts of motor power weighs a couple hundred kilograms - far more than a clutch or two. And costs far more than a clutch. And you don't actually have the power to run it when you're running the other motors. There's no logic to not using the traction motors.
You don't have enough samples to justify any statement like that. For the same reason as some people see regressions while others go "hey, this is miraculous". But hey, its the weekend. I just got done bottling two different meads. Both tasty (and alcoholic, ~13% ABV), both different. Um... topicality? Right! Raven -> Odin -> Norse -> Mjölnir -> runes --- I give them names that are anagrams of rune names. Later this year I'll be able to sip some UK Naan![]()
Haha, good analogy! But Daimler isn't trying to get OFF the tracks (that was GM when they stopped selling cars in Europe due to their unwillingness to meet stricter CO2 emissions limits).I do believe that Diess really wants to go electric. But he's hobbled by the company's current infrastructure, investor expectations, and a board who's not as enthusiastic as he is.