All we heard from them was “why hasn’t Musk changed guidance yet? He’s clearly not going to get to 360k!!” Now it’s “delivery numbers don’t matter, never have. A company attempting to rid the world of pollution from vehicles in a timely manner and provide clean energy to the world from a factory in California should be showing profit! That’s all that matters”
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
TSLAQ FUD was alive and will on CNBC this afternoon. I do think Musk has been his own worst enemy at times, but what they were saying today was borderline if not slanderous.
Owning a Roadster back when they were bleeding edge tech does not reflect in any fashion on a person's character
Donald Trump owned two American cars; one was a Tesla
anthonyj
Stonks
My brother picked up his M3P today 
it’s so factory fresh. It still has the suction cup marks on the windshield from the factory assembly robot lol. September 2019 build date. East coast. Amazing. The middle storage compartment has way better build quality than previous Model 3’s. Has the new annoying pedestrian warning speaker too
it’s so factory fresh. It still has the suction cup marks on the windshield from the factory assembly robot lol. September 2019 build date. East coast. Amazing. The middle storage compartment has way better build quality than previous Model 3’s. Has the new annoying pedestrian warning speaker too
Pras
Member
Looking at Tesla deliver time after time, I can’t help but patting myself to have spotted a talent when others around me did not.
Tesla is the best and most credible of the growth stories. It is not a software or an app that can be easy come easy go. The very deterrent nature of car industry that made tough for Tesla to establish, will now be its yet another winning strength. In EV, the advantage will be hard to overcome by new adopters / rookies like VW or BMW.
Tesla is the best and most credible of the growth stories. It is not a software or an app that can be easy come easy go. The very deterrent nature of car industry that made tough for Tesla to establish, will now be its yet another winning strength. In EV, the advantage will be hard to overcome by new adopters / rookies like VW or BMW.
Pras
Member
Nice to see an NJ plate! I see a lot of these in my NJT parking lot.My brother picked up his M3P today
View attachment 459387 View attachment 459388
After all the criticism of shorts, we may find out in the end they are very generous people..
Carl Raymond
Active Member
If this gets shunted, so be it, but it’s the funniest thing our ABC has produced for a while. Watch it if you love Greta.
Twitter
Shorts will be needing a similar helpline soon.
Shorts will be needing a similar helpline soon.
RobStark
Well-Known Member
Bollinger unveils new B1/B2 electric utility truck and pickup - Electrek
614 Horsepower
Cool!
100 MPH Top Speed
Ugh that's very low, will struggle on the Autobahn and wont get below 10:00 on the Nürburgring, must be limited by something??
Oh, never mind:
Bollinger was clearly trying to save costs by completely eliminating the aero design team.
Also, they should not expect a top score for NCAP and IIHS "pedestrian protection" either - that front is more like a freight train than a modern curved car front that gives pedestrians a chance of survival...
The grids around the headlight are for aerodynamics.
The Bollinger's Nürburgring is the Rubicon Trail.
Bollinger's Porsche is Land Rover.
Bollinger's potential customer base doesn't give a rats ass about Deutchland's Autobahn.
Yes but I said 103185. None of this mamby pamby “approximation” *sugar*. That’s the number. I’d stake money on it. Well, somebodys money anyway.
RobStark
Well-Known Member
Porsche said LG was unable to deliver cells with the necessary C rate to charge at 350 kW.
Everything else is ready to go.
A year or two from now when the cells are ready they will go to 350 kW.
Like Tesla, they are starting below advertised peak charging speed. They will look at the data to confirm their educated guesses. And slowly update the software to allow 270 kW.
Short data pondering.
For the last 5 trading days volumebot has reported 60% or more of the trades involved short sales. That would be some 10.1 million shares. But the sept 13th shows a short interest of 39 million shares. I am thinking there is a lot of short term short positions perhaps clossing out just before the required reporting day? Possibly the same day or within days of when they were opened?
For the last 5 trading days volumebot has reported 60% or more of the trades involved short sales. That would be some 10.1 million shares. But the sept 13th shows a short interest of 39 million shares. I am thinking there is a lot of short term short positions perhaps clossing out just before the required reporting day? Possibly the same day or within days of when they were opened?
JRP3
Hyperactive Member
Sure, and Tesla has a 500 mile range pack ready to go, as soon as the cells are good enough.
Todd Burch
14-Year Member
Tesla's IPO price on June 29, 2010 was $17. It's a 10-bagger.
>20 bagger (if you sold at the right time) and potentially more in the future.
Last edited:
Joe F
Disruption is hard.
Many believe in climate change. I see you are in Florida. Good luck. I hope you’re a renter."believer" being the operative word.
FYI Bill Maher is a big supporter of believing in science and taking action on climate change. In that regard he s a friend to Tesla. He is however less enthusiastic on Elon Musk, and I recall at least two segments on his show where he criticised Elon’s plans for Mars settlement - arguing that those resources should be used to solve earth problems.
I disagree there - Musk is expending a gigantic amount of resources combatting climate change with Tesla, and it is stupid to criticise his Mars effort which is aimed at solving a seperate problem which is also a huge problem for humanity (the extinction risk inherent of being a single planet species).
I disagree there - Musk is expending a gigantic amount of resources combatting climate change with Tesla, and it is stupid to criticise his Mars effort which is aimed at solving a seperate problem which is also a huge problem for humanity (the extinction risk inherent of being a single planet species).
Joe F
Disruption is hard.
Settling mars will also take a ton os scientific development. It used to be people talked about the things we got out of NASA like miniaturization of circuit boards for computers.
Elon's kinda a one man NASA. He build electric vehicles for transportation on a planet with no fossil fuel, expanded solar growth resulting in decreased costs and increased efficiencies, created tunneling technology for underground housing on mars. SpaceX is just one piece.
StealthP3D
Well-Known Member
People who know more about Tesla and Elon Musk than the CNBC talking heads (which is just about everyone
) know that Musk would not have sent the e-mail if they weren't at least going to be close to the 100,000 number.85K is basically out of the question. So this is a good benchmark to have thrown out there because people who put any stock in these jokers are going to be really impressed with the announced numbers.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
