Everyone? Are you saying someone who sold at $950 wasn't able to time the market?
Statistically, they will fail more often than they succeed. A random investor is not as "well armed" in this battle as funds with bots.
We need to relax on this "buy now, buy tomorrow, buy @ $1200" nonsense. We get it, you like Tesla.
That's literally the opposite of what I said. I said if you're not buy and hold, you should buy on the way down / sell on the way up - not the opposite. Which is just basic math.
Example. Let's say the stock is $700, goes to $900, and you practice each strategy at $50 increments, starting after it first makes a move (because you're not a bot / MM, you're not going to know the instant it's going to move significantly in one direction, or how far it's going to go).
Buy on the way up / sell on the way down:
- $750: Buy X shares ($750*X)
- $800: Buy X shares ($800*X)
- $850: Buy X shares ($850*X)
- $900: Buy X shares ($900*X)
- $850: Sell X shares ($850*X)
- $800: Sell X shares ($800*X)
- $750: Sell X shares ($750*X)
- $700: Sell X shares ($700*X)
Net result: X*(-750-800-850-900+850+800+750+700) = You lose $300 * X, where X is the number of shares you bought/sold at each increment
Now we invert it: sell on the way up / buy on the way down:
- $750: Sell X shares ($750*X)
- $800: Sell X shares ($800*X)
- $850: Sell X shares ($850*X)
- $900: Sell X shares ($900*X)
- $850: Buy X shares ($850*X)
- $800: Buy X shares ($800*X)
- $750: Buy X shares ($750*X)
- $700: Buy X shares ($700*X)
Net result: X*(750+800+850+900-850-800-750-700) = You gain $300 * X, where X is the number of shares you bought/sold at each increment.
Don't be dumb and bet against basic arithmetic...