StealthP3D
Well-Known Member
To be clear, no one mentioned the government limiting the birthrate. Except for you.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
To be clear, no one mentioned the government limiting the birthrate. Except for you.
Dan Detweiler
Active Member
JRP3
Hyperactive Member
Government and society already dictate what you can do with your private life. You can't beat your wife for example. "Freedom" always has limits unless you live outside of society and don't get caught.
Dan Detweiler
Active Member
StealthP3D
Well-Known Member
I did. Can you take your arguments to another thread please?
Dan Detweiler
Active Member
Come on, that analogy is stretching it a bit, don't you think? I can't invite all my friends over to the house and gun them all down either.
Anyway, this is way off topic and the market is open. As always, I respect all of your views. Just struck a cord with me. Sorry.
Dan
Straw-man argument. Nobody in the discussion here has implied or suggested that there be a law requiring people limit their birthrate. You are tilting at windmills here. Glad to see you support personal choice, Pro-Choice can always use more voices.
I support the idea of avoiding earthquake areas for important facilities so expanding beyond CA can be helpful.
I would also seek locations where water is plentiful but not a flood risk and severe storms need not be a concern and a robust educational research vitality in the local culture. Of course a nearby jetport is helpful. Any area is going to welcome a manufacturer with a growing business running round the clock.
Tesla has a broad choice but SpaceX is more likely to desire to remain further South so Texas may be the reasonable first choice but other future location choices are not far off IMO.
Yeah, that is actually not true.
The era of systematic voter suppression in Texas (and all across the South) corresponded with the period the Democratic Party controlled the state.
Gerrymandering in Texas is likewise something the Democratic Party embraced for as long as they could, only seeing the tables turned when the state shifted firmly into the Republican camp in the 1990s.
"In 1991, the Democrats redrew the state’s congressional map to create what the Almanac of American Politics called “the shrewdest gerrymander of the 1990s . . . with incredibly convoluted lines . . . pack(ing) heavily Republican suburban areas into just a few districts.” The resulting firestorm of litigation ended when a federal court voided primary elections in 13 districts and imposed a court-drawn map.
In 2003, it was the Republicans’ turn to gerrymander, resulting in the famous flight of Democrats to New Mexico and then Oklahoma in an ultimately futile effort to block the maps. That round of redistricting also resulted in a trip for Texas to the Supreme Court."
Gerrymandering is a Texas tradition whose time has come and gone
Fracking has eliminated non-earthquake areas.
I'm thinking about a new license plate that says "8004LIFE"
Any negative news out there I'm not aware of?
Any negative news out there I'm not aware of?
Heads up for those still discussing birth rates, diets, gerrymandering, personal freedom and the civil war (and I may have missed a few subjects): OT weekend is over.
Can you explain how does this relate to Tesla investments? There are plenty places on the internet where you can discuss your views on this, where you do not look like spammer. I miss the moderators. And Mr. Detweiler you are on ignore from me.
mickificki
Member
Article pretty much says some ANALysts were puzzled why Elon wanted Fremont opened so badly, but concluded that he wants Tesla inclusion in S&P500 and the longer things sat idle the less chance of that happening.
Says survey of analysts by factset predict a loss of $387 mil at 67,000 deliveries this Q.
mentions 4 q's cumulative profit with the last q profitable for inclusion...
gary black, investor and former ceo of aegon asset mgmt thinks tesla can make a $2mil profit for 2q, based on his views of 80k deliveries from china + back log inventory from q1.
alludes to Elon's accounting bag of tricks to get profit, ie sale of tax credits.
assumes that tesla can enjoy 7 weeks of production in 2q.
barclays brian johnson (the gem that he is) is dubious about S&P inclusion after 2q, thinks 63k produced in 2q.
ProfTournesol
Member
volume is boring low today. TLSA should be 3x times higer than QQQ, at least 6%, but stuck at 2.6%....
In Belgium too, annual tax is based on emissions, so EV's attract the lowest rate - which isn't €0, but around €80.
For a car with similar performance to a Tesla you'll be paying €1000's...
The manipulation has started early this week!
Can we get one damn day of natural trading where the stock doesn't dive right at open and then get walked lower all day????
Its been weeks now of the same trading action, day in and day out. Literally the only day in the past 3 to 4 weeks that did not exhibit the same exact capping/walk down methods was of course the day the uptick rule was in effect.
Its been weeks now of the same trading action, day in and day out. Literally the only day in the past 3 to 4 weeks that did not exhibit the same exact capping/walk down methods was of course the day the uptick rule was in effect.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
