A battle to the finish, but ending up positive! Wish Gonzaga could have done that last night, but congrats to Baylor!
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe...but it was just obvious that there were pushdowns to try to keep it red throughout the day.Really? I thought it was more clear yesterday. Nasdaq did nothing, QQQ did nothing. Hey Tesla actually performed better than macro..lol.
Two green days in a row, hell, that's something, no?
There's been so much expectation for the new model to be called the "2" so the line would be 2-S3XYThat must be fake news. I've been told many times that even the Model 3 is simply too big for many Italian streets and will never sell well there.
/s
Indeed. A gain of 0.0825% per day during each of 252 trading days in a year results in an annual gain of 23%.Really? I thought it was more clear yesterday. Nasdaq did nothing, QQQ did nothing. Hey Tesla actually performed better than macro..lol.
Sounds like my grades in the last semester in college... still haven't figured out the z3...We just had a Moody’s upgrade. Like in the month of March upgrade. And two whole levels to some junk rating named Bz3aaa-+.
FYI, it was summarily ignored by the market, media, analysts and Santa Claus.
I agree that occasional stock splits seem like the right approach to me. I dig the 5:1 split as much as anyone, but if more frequent 2:1 keep the shorts occasionally in check, I would be happy with that. I suspect Elon has much greater contempt for shorts than me, so I trust his leadership here.The issue was if Elon could surprise us with a split whenever he wished as you phrased it.
Since a vote, even one that's certain to pass, needs to happen to authorize more shares first- he can't (unless it was a very small split as noted which seems very unlikely).
Pretty sure several folks have pointed out why they can't- given the # of authorized shares, and the # needed for SBC.
It's more like 1.9:1 at best with current share cap.
Again all of this can easily be "fixed" by a vote to authorize more shares, but a 2:1 or greater split can't be a "surprise" ahead of that happening because there's not enough shares.
I know there was tremendous debate between a lot of folks on if that's really the case or not.
But let's consider it from this perspective regarding "small" splits.
Do you agree Tesla (and Elon explicitly) dislikes shorts and would like to burn them and dissuade them as much as possible?
If so (and I think the evidence is pretty clear it's the case)... AND every stock dividend, even a tiny one, screws over all the shorts.... why wouldn't they just issue an exceedingly tiny split on a relatively frequent but irregular basis- to routinely screw over all the folks naked shorting the stock?
If it's as simple to screw the shorts as ANY stock dividend, and Tesla hates shorts, why only the 1 so far?
Why would they NOT be sticking it to shorts multiple times a year until the shorts stop bothering if it's that simple?
I remember those 12 green days in a row.We haven't seen that since...*checks calendar*...last week!
We will do a 2:1 split at random date once a quarter as long as the share price is above X.I agree that occasional stock splits seem like the right approach to me. I dig the 5:1 split as much as anyone, but if more frequent 2:1 keep the shorts occasionally in check, I would be happy with that. I suspect Elon has much greater contempt for shorts than me, so I trust his leadership here.
By the way, couldnt Tesla just announce a 5:1 split pending shareholder approval with the date of xxxx? Is that a thing? If so, it might help with the element of surprise?
I’m with you. I would love a 2 to 3 point swing daily with a trend to 2.5 + points daily average. Sigh....Indeed. A gain of 0.0825% per day during each of 252 trading days in a year results in an annual gain of 23%.
The interesting part of that story is the “Family Office” investing structure. Very little transparency even for the banks.OT
Morgan Stanley dumped $5 billion in Archegos’ stocks the night before massive fire sale hit rivals
It's a previously unreported detail that shows the extraordinary steps some banks took to protect themselves from incurring losses amid a client's meltdown.www.cnbc.com
The night before the Archegos Capital story burst into public view late last month, the fund’s biggest prime broker quietly unloaded some of its risky positions to hedge funds
MM don't care whose blood is spilled.
Typical case of dog eat dog. Unfortunately, they can act like this without any major consequences.OT
Morgan Stanley dumped $5 billion in Archegos’ stocks the night before massive fire sale hit rivals
It's a previously unreported detail that shows the extraordinary steps some banks took to protect themselves from incurring losses amid a client's meltdown.www.cnbc.com
The night before the Archegos Capital story burst into public view late last month, the fund’s biggest prime broker quietly unloaded some of its risky positions to hedge funds
MM don't care whose blood is spilled.
I can confirm this is true for my new model S. Email today from Tesla confirmed best case is June (for Toronto). Non-plaid.
Really hoping that all these banks are tightening their margin requirements and reducing interest swaps. These are the things that cause financial crisis when left unchecked. Reduce fictional money introduced to the market asap because there are too many big whale gamblers trying to make it big.OT
Morgan Stanley dumped $5 billion in Archegos’ stocks the night before massive fire sale hit rivals
It's a previously unreported detail that shows the extraordinary steps some banks took to protect themselves from incurring losses amid a client's meltdown.www.cnbc.com
The night before the Archegos Capital story burst into public view late last month, the fund’s biggest prime broker quietly unloaded some of its risky positions to hedge funds
MM don't care whose blood is spilled.
While I don't doubt the delivery estimate for your Model S, something would have to be very, very wrong if deliveries aren't starting until June for any location. Would be a mini-disaster on Tesla's part when it comes to executing their business to have production lines down and no deliveries for 6 months of the new S/X. Obviously S/X don't mean nearly as much to revenue and profit anymore, but still.....it would be a pretty big black eye.I can confirm this is true for my new model S. Email today from Tesla confirmed best case is June (for Toronto). Non-plaid.
Before jumping into conclusions, the guy is in Canada which I expect later deliveries than US.While I don't doubt the delivery estimate for your Model S, something would have to be very, very wrong if deliveries aren't starting until June for any location. Would be a mini-disaster on Tesla's part when it comes to executing their business to have production lines down and no deliveries for 6 months of the new S/X. Obviously S/X don't mean nearly as much to revenue and profit anymore, but still.....it would be a pretty big black eye.