Thanks, I totally missed that. I would assume they come from CN and not Fremont...Make of this what you will. Doesn’t say where they are exported from.
In Just 3 Months Tesla Model Y Becomes Most Imported Vehicle In South Korea
Tesla started selling the Model Y back in April with initial 9 deliveries. And now after 2 months, the company has delivered over 3000 vehicles for the month of May making it the most imported vehicle in the country.www.torquenews.com
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
Agree. The guy has been kicking goals for a decade at Tesla and no small part of why the company is where it is today is because of his work.
The S/X upgrades have been delayed....but much less so than the original X launch, the 3 ramp (which Jerome helped fix with the tent) and many other projects over Tesla's life.
I think there's little chance that Jerome suddenly got demoted/fired because the update took a few extra months, particularly because delays are accepted by Elon under the right circumstances.
In my opinion, it's more likely that Jerome had been doing long hours for a decade and told Elon he wanted to move on. Elon gave him the focus on the Semi project as a way of trying to keep Jerome in the company but with more flexibility and time to focus on a passion project. Ultimately that wasn't enough for Jerome to keep his interest in the long hours.
Agreed. In Australia we can't even order them. If they are exporting, at least send a couple our way.
Looks like Tesla sold 11,095 Model 3 in May in China. That means that it was 3 times the number sold in April according to a Reuters article early this morning.
Last edited:
Todesbuckler
Member
CPCA data seems to be published:
Tesla China May data:
Wholesale: 33,463
Retail: 21,936
Export: 11,527
Tesla China May data:
Wholesale: 33,463
Retail: 21,936
Export: 11,527
I guess CN numbers are decent...
@StealthP3DI'll never understand why seemingly normal people visit those dark corners of the Internet.
sometimes curiosity as to if they have changed their outlooks or mindsets.
chatted with someone, pushed a few rhetorical buttons in a slightly condescending, somewhat supercilious manner
“what have you done to preserve your wealth?” she asked me
pointed out she, while wealthy from very active trading, I did no work other than buy and hold,
pointed out that she lacks even a scintilla of a vision of the future that I have been pointing out since 2012 and fail at basic comprehension,
(pushed buttons that drive them into a tizzy whilst refining my viewpoints
pointed out that 7 figure fluctuations of portfolio valuation do not concern me anymore as we are at the beginning of the exponential curve, as they no longer do.
TSLAQ remains mired in a tangled web, but it’s nice seeing they cannot mature or even glimpse the future that 100’s of 1,000’s of us do, growing in numbers every day
(and i’m probably not “normal”), (90 degrees incident)
Last edited:
Mike Smith
Active Member
Good timing - the China news completely wipes out the Jerome news. Was going to open below $600, now $625 pre market
accumulated another 57 shares last week, at a very tasty $589/share
(hugs and sloppy wet kisses to all the bots scraping comments from here)
Wake up, Samurai. We got short sellers to burn.
Todd Burch
14-Year Member
Ok, so the China nunbers were good, but the 44/45k number which was supposedly corroborated by multiple sources was totally nonsense?
Wish everyone out there on the interwebs (bulls, bears, and media) would stop posting their “rumors from a source”. It’s all hogwash.
There’s just about one remaining inside source I trust, and he has been “Wright” just about every time that I can remember.
Wish everyone out there on the interwebs (bulls, bears, and media) would stop posting their “rumors from a source”. It’s all hogwash.
There’s just about one remaining inside source I trust, and he has been “Wright” just about every time that I can remember.
MartinAustin
Active Member
Dancing Lemur
Hoopy Frood
Am I allowed to be disappointed that the 44K leak wasn’t true? Or that it didn’t hit Rob’s 38K estimate?
I mean, 33K is nice, but doesn’t live up to the fantasy I’d constructed.
I mean, 33K is nice, but doesn’t live up to the fantasy I’d constructed.
ZachF
Active Member
Also, re: Mach-E:
Massive Range Test Staged In Norway: 21 EVs Driven Until Dead
Almost all vehicles exceeded the claimed WLTP range stated by the manufacturer in this summer EV range test, but the BMW iX3 drove 20 percent beyond it.insideevs.com
The Norwegian Automotive Federation (NAF for short) staged its second electric vehicle range test this year. It tested 21 new EVs, driving them on a full charge of their batteries, until they died on the side of the road. The goal of the test was to not only see the vehicles’ actual real-world range, but to also see just how accurate the claimed WLTP range really is.
The Tesla Model 3 Long Range was the overall winner, according to the source, and it managed a very impressive 654.9 km (406.9 miles). Next was the Ford Mustang Mach-E Long Range RWD 617.9 km (383.9 miles), or just 27 km (16.7 miles) less than the Tesla. The source points out the Model 3 it tested is the updated version with the 614 km WLTP claimed range (up from the pre-refresh model's 580 km).
Comprehension ability of Ford fans(?)
Polestar didn't do too great there
Looks to me like the China data might be deliveries with export counting as a delivery?
So the production numbers could be different.
Official production and delivery numbers are what count.
You are right, rumous are wrong more often than not.
ZachF
Active Member
Also, re: Mach-E:
Massive Range Test Staged In Norway: 21 EVs Driven Until Dead
Almost all vehicles exceeded the claimed WLTP range stated by the manufacturer in this summer EV range test, but the BMW iX3 drove 20 percent beyond it.
The Norwegian Automotive Federation (NAF for short) staged its second electric vehicle range test this year. It tested 21 new EVs, driving them on a full charge of their batteries, until they died on the side of the road. The goal of the test was to not only see the vehicles’ actual real-world range, but to also see just how accurate the claimed WLTP range really is.
The Tesla Model 3 Long Range was the overall winner, according to the source, and it managed a very impressive 654.9 km (406.9 miles). Next was the Ford Mustang Mach-E Long Range RWD 617.9 km (383.9 miles), or just 27 km (16.7 miles) less than the Tesla. The source points out the Model 3 it tested is the updated version with the 614 km WLTP claimed range (up from the pre-refresh model's 580 km).
Comprehension ability of Ford fans(?)
Polestar needs to do a little work...
It looks like the 44/45k number fortunately wasn't taken seriously by the market or not widely dispersed, or we would have seen a drop in premarket due to 'disappointing numbers'.
Johan
Ex got M3 in the divorce, waiting for EU Model Y!
All inn all good China numbers. Will be good to get some more detail on this in the Q2 letter from Tesla. Seems very likely to me there was a pause/hold up due to parts and delays in March/April and that the curve during May is pointing upwards quite sharply. In other words it seems like this bodes well with regard to total Q2 numbers from China.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
