It flies for everyone with an IRA.Yeah, that's called a 'bank-account' tax, not income tax. And it won't fly in America.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It flies for everyone with an IRA.Yeah, that's called a 'bank-account' tax, not income tax. And it won't fly in America.
Please could one of you experienced folk explain to my simple logical brain why is there always an obsession with gap-filling?
It really feels like an OCD thing more than anything!
Seriously, why is it That important to make sure every dollar is covered by a stock at some point during a trading day. Why does it matter if the stock gaps up or down, really?
This has been really bugging me!
Thanks!
Hoping to have missed it by one time zone! If Elon is selling today, then this will get worse. If not, we'll quickly turn green as hedgies cover. That's my current theory. They're front-running and then will wait to see if legit 250k sell orders start popping up.Missed it by that much....
Consider how the institution making the margin loan against the shares is being paid interest, and, is paying taxes on that interest earned as income. So, there already is tax being paid on a margin loan and the shareholder is funding that tax through payment of interest accrued.That's a good point. If you're using collateral to take value out of your holdings it should be treated as income. You are no longer just holding it. You are essentially using it as income to live off of. It would still make the tax percentage paid look miniscule but it would at least close that loophole for paying zero taxes.
Hand a technical trader a chart without a ticker symbol and they’d still tell you how they’d trade it. It doesn’t matter one bit to them what the company does.Gap Trading: How to Play the Gap
Disruptions in stock patterns are known as gaps. Learn how you can earn money by analyzing these disruptions in normal price patterns.www.investopedia.com
Common TA tactic that has a pretty decent success rate (that said TA is just a different form of numerology ) . Many gaps never get filled (signals a change in fundamentals as evaluated by the market), but when movement happens near gaps, they tend to be magnets.
This price action is puzzling as Tesla's future has never ever looked this good.
A backlog of many, many months (with some trims over one year out), price increases, two new factories, increasing battery supply, Semi & Cybertruck prototypes, etc. etc.
Record profits for 2022 are guaranteed. And this during a time when all other car makers are struggling.
In Q2, despite having sales much less than Ford and GM, Tesla showed it's operating efficiency by delivery Operating Income margin of 11% while Ford delivered 0% and GM 8%.
View attachment 744167
In Q3, not only did Tesla again deliver higher OpInc margins 15% (vs 4% and 6% for Ford and GM, respectively), they delivered more OpInc $$ with $2.0B vs Ford's $1.3B and GM $1.6B.
View attachment 744168
In Q4, I expect Tesla's OpInc margin to increase 17% with Operating Income of $2.8B.
The issue Legacy OEMs face, is that they will need to put new capital to work to establish their EV business meaning additional fixed costs while declining ICE sales will but a strain on the cost of production for these ICE vehicles as output declines potentially leading to stranded assets. I see restructuring charges in the future for Legacy auto.
All True. This particular extended downdraft is mostly a result of the manipulators knowing there is a large, captured seller in the market. I.e., nothing to do with valuation, IMO.This price action is puzzling as Tesla's future has never ever looked this good.
A backlog of many, many months (with some trims over one year out), price increases, two new factories, increasing battery supply, Semi & Cybertruck prototypes, etc. etc.
Record profits for 2022 are guaranteed. And this during a time when all other car makers are struggling.
In Q2, despite having sales much less than Ford and GM, Tesla showed it's operating efficiency by delivery Operating Income margin of 11% while Ford delivered 0% and GM 8%.
View attachment 744167
In Q3, not only did Tesla again deliver higher OpInc margins 15% (vs 4% and 6% for Ford and GM, respectively), they delivered more OpInc $$ with $2.0B vs Ford's $1.3B and GM $1.6B.
View attachment 744168
In Q4, I expect Tesla's OpInc margin to increase 17% with Operating Income of $2.8B.
The issue Legacy OEMs face, is that they will need to put new capital to work to establish their EV business meaning additional fixed costs while declining ICE sales will but a strain on the cost of production for these ICE vehicles as output declines potentially leading to stranded assets. I see restructuring charges in the future for Legacy auto.
Ah I'm a bit upset with myself, was watching and thought when it was down to 930 that we would see a quick raid into the low 900's and held off. I was looking at Jan 24 1000 LEAPS
Hand a technical trader a chart without a ticker symbol and they’d still tell you how they’d trade it. It doesn’t matter one bit to them what the company does.
Won’t whatever EM pays for 2021 have to be adjusted by the number of years covered? All the income for EM happened over years. Apples and apples and all.
2022 is still very much a work in progress but I am currently modeling $86.7B in sales on 1.5m deliveries (plus energy and services):
View attachment 744190
Note: the CEO award is a question mark for 2022. The 160m is the remainder of the current award program; I am not sure if a new program will be approved by the BoD in 2022 bring more expense to next year.
What if the shareholder doesnt pay it off and when the pass the shares are inherited by children and with step up basis the unrealized capital gains get wiped out. Children then sell to pay off the loan. Am I missing something? As with any tax regulation this can all kick in when the wealth of the individual is extremely high. Doesnt have to be everyone.Consider how the institution making the margin loan against the shares is being paid interest, and, is paying taxes on that interest earned as income. So, there already is tax being paid on a margin loan and the shareholder is funding that tax through payment of interest accrued.
Add to this how, eventually, the shareholder will either pay back the loan, or, (more likely) sell the shares to zero it out. When they sell, they will have realized the "income" they were already enjoying as a loan and will owe Cap Gains tax on that amount at that time.
It all comes out in the wash.
You are missing something. Debts have to be paid off before assets are distributed to the heirs, so taxes will be paid. And if you taxed the money withdrawn as a loan, do you credit the tax back when the loan is repaid? Or are you saying that they should be double taxed?What if the shareholder doesnt pay it off and when the pass the shares are inherited by children and with step up basis the unrealized capital gains get wiped out. Children then sell to pay off the loan. Am I missing something?
Trying to hit the exact bottom for the day/week is futile. Make plans/research and just go for it with every tick of the tape - there is a 50/50 possibility it will go up or down.
with IV dip and these prices I think we are in a good range for buying LEAPS ..
.. now need to twiddle by thumb and wait for a plethora of good news to come for 2022.
Well, it looks like today is the day we test that infamous TA-myth.Please could one of you experienced folk explain to my simple logical brain why is there always an obsession with gap-filling?
It really feels like an OCD thing more than anything!
Seriously, why is it That important to make sure every dollar is covered by a stock at some point during a trading day. Why does it matter if the stock gaps up or down, really?
This has been really bugging me!
Thanks!
Thanks for the clarity on how the step up basis works. Are we sure that is exactly how it is handled. As for double tax I have no problem with the tax paid being a non refundable credit when the loan is repaid.You are missing something. Debts have to be paid off before assets are distributed to the heirs, so taxes will be paid. And if you taxed the money withdrawn as a loan, do you credit the tax back when the loan is repaid? Or are you saying that they should be double taxed?