You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've never really liked the "near death" arguments Elon has made (particularly over the last 5 years). Elon has a ton of rich mates and there is a legion of wealthy fans. Near Death = some dilution from an equity capital raise.
WTF happened to Elon? Seriously. He sounds like he's move pretty far right.
Things were bad under Trump, if someone can't see that, I've lost respect for them. The GOP has lost their damn mind concerning how they want to govern this nation.
I'm really having a hard time liking Elon anymore and wanting to say positive things to others....
View attachment 799729
David Faber now saying this Reuters piece is nonsense.
What I think is happening is Tesla had a bad number in their year end report showing inaccurate % of Elon's share are already committed elsewhere. While they scramble to update that figure, shorts try to jump on the confusion and say Elon's potentially in danger of margin call.
Elon's now going around looking to limit his exposure bringing in other whales, as was planned, and shorts are trying to tie the two narratives together.
Probably got refuted and all sorted out, leading to this marketwide rebound. I think the whole world may be orbiting Elon at this point.
Hurrah!Due to the nature of BTC if TSLA just holds it, especially if they hold it offline (I'm sure they're doing for security reasons), there is no energy consumed. The energy is consumed when a transaction of BTC occurs. I would argue that selling it now is more detrimental in energy consumption than waiting until more of the grid is powered by renewable resources. There is no consumption by simply holding the BTC (because BTC is proof of work, not proof of Stake). It's also a hedge against some inflation and other measures so holding it isn't much different than holding Gold. I would vote our measly shares against an action to force selling it as selling it doesn't solve anything and is actually worse than holding.
Can’t find the actual Reuters link but:
Elon Musk Is Reportedly In Talks With Investment Firms About New Twitter Financing That Would Tie Up Less Of His Wealth In $44B Acquisition - Reuters
wow.I think the whole world may be orbiting Elon at this point.
double helping of Alphabet GOOG and GOOGL?All this volatility has one goal.....banks accumulating shares in the top 5 weighted stocks in the S&P500.
It's all about.....TAAAAM!
Tesla
Apple
Alphabet
Alphabet
Amazon
Microsoft
Nothing can stop what is coming. Nothing.
Nooooo! Don’t tempt the Gods!Nothing can stop what is coming. Nothing.
Your baby seal analogy does not work. Disposing of the baby seal skins will use energy but it will not kill more seals. Selling bitcoin triggers transactional processes that consume as much, or more energy, as purchasing those bitcoins. The most environmentally safe thing Tesla can do is hold those Bitcoin without generating any new transactions until the transaction process is greatly improved or running on renewal energy.Hurrah!
I am going to use your logic to swathe Jenny, Gus, even me….and - why not? - all our lodge’s beds with those beautiful, wonderfully warm and cuddly pure white baby seal skins because you know what? Those seals are ALREADY DEAD!
And more closely related, Tesla’s use - either for payments OR for balance sheet purposes - by itself ===>helps legitimize <=== cryptocurrencies, thus absolutely, unassailably increasing demand for same.
WTF happened to Elon? Seriously. He sounds like he's move pretty far right.
Things were bad under Trump, if someone can't see that, I've lost respect for them. The GOP has lost their damn mind concerning how they want to govern this nation.
I'm really having a hard time liking Elon anymore and wanting to say positive things to others....
Potentially. But from a quick look back at the financials the worst position in terms of cash burn was around the end of 2017/early 2018. Even at their worst they were burning about 10% of market cap p.a. - so unless they thought they wouldn't be able to fix the production problems nor could they rein in any capex/opex, they still could have raised funds for about 10% dilution per year to keep them going. Not a pretty outcome to be sure (and there would eventually be limits on investor willingness to bankroll losses), but still nowhere near "weeks from death" IMO.I think the thing we are missing and missed at the time what just how screwed up the Model 3 rollout was. In the recent interview that came out of the TED talk, the interviewer alluded to over automation as the problem, which we all knew about, but Elon corrected him. Elon said that every single facet of the factory was messed up. The paint shop, GA, body, probably logistics both incoming and outgoing too. Basically, the ramp from 50,000 vehicles a year to 300,000 was a big jump and Tesla was flailing.
So, does that mean near death? If you've hired for 300,000 production and you can only get out 50,000 units for an extended period of time, then yeah, that'll drain cash out of a company so fast it'll make your head spin. When you raise money, you need to disclose current financials and I'm sure they looked absolutely awful at that point. As I recall, the stock price, pre-split, was around $180/share briefly around that time. So, that's $36 in current stock price (5-1 split, right?).
I probably have some of the production numbers wrong, but you get the idea on the magnitude.