We will never be done. We will always find a use for more energy.Elon talks about "getting to 3TWh of cells" annually. What he doesn't talk about is when the world finally hits 200TWh in total cell supply..... we'll be all but done.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We will never be done. We will always find a use for more energy.Elon talks about "getting to 3TWh of cells" annually. What he doesn't talk about is when the world finally hits 200TWh in total cell supply..... we'll be all but done.
That's a little better, but it still doesn't fully take into account the effects of America's switch from coal to natural (methane) gas. It's only showing CO2. Also, it is not taking into account the historical, cumulative emissions.Here is the per capita version ...... though to be fair to all countries the amount of offshoring of (especially) heavy industry in the immediate post-2000 period flatters many Western economies, to the detriment of China. Accounting for - and addressing fairly and squarely - such offshore emissions is a valid aim of CBAMs.
View attachment 836506
T
These people who keep choosing to develop hydrogen vehicles, are they incapable of performing simple arithmetic?
Morning from Eu!
Why isn't there Netflix documentary about Tesla's consensus bubble & record short selling and then being literally the best performance stock & company in 2020? It's hilarious and ironical AF, I mean the consensus worst turns out to be the best - out of thousands of companies. LOL. There is epic material from Spiegel's short selling seminar, bears in finance media, famous people shorting like Gates and Burry etc.
Someone make this happen!
I always try to give people the benefit of doubt so when I read the CEO's quote, "hydrogen is the missing piece of the puzzle that can complete e-mobility where BEVs will not prevail", I thought ok maybe he's talking about vehicles in a 3rd world country where the grid is not well developed or some niche vehicle.
Nope, no red flags here:
BREAKING!!! Lucid CEO Sells Stock: $180 Million - Massive! (Warren Redlich from Mar 10, 2022)
...can't say there were no signs.
Cheers!
Warren Redlich as usual is a little fast and lose with facts and truth.
These people who keep choosing to develop hydrogen vehicles, are they incapable of performing simple arithmetic?
These people who keep choosing to develop hydrogen vehicles, are they incapable of performing simple arithmetic?
Imagine if Tesla were to hire Cleese (and others like him) as a spokesperson to dispel FUD?
If you can source electric motors and charger/ inverter and cannot bothI think some of the legacy OEM's are so desperate to utilize their existing ICE infrastructure they will do and say anything to convince themselves it's a great strategy. This includes ignoring the obvious fact that EV's and electric transportation are the future, NOT hydrogen. It's true hydrogen might find a niche purpose for long haul point to point trucking, but it has zero potential in consumer cars.
That ship has already sailed, and I find it sad that some legacy CEO's still can't come to terms with that fact. I feel sorry for the employees of those companies.
Nope, no red flags here:
BREAKING!!! Lucid CEO Sells Stock: $180 Million - Massive! (Warren Redlich from Mar 10, 2022)
...can't say there were no signs.
Cheers!
A big question of some relation to Tesla and the mission: How much of the egregious per capita emissions shown for Americans and Australians is related to driving cars? One look at the wide, low density population of a lot of car-loving America, and that same sort of distribution "on steroids" for giant and sparsely-populated Australia certainly gives a believable rationale for a lot of the height of those curves.Here is the per capita version ...... though to be fair to all countries the amount of offshoring of (especially) heavy industry in the immediate post-2000 period flatters many Western economies, to the detriment of China. Accounting for - and addressing fairly and squarely - such offshore emissions is a valid aim of CBAMs.
View attachment 836506
T
Who is investigating what? Was there a post about it? Something, somewhere? If so, please provide a link. Meanwhile, I've still not seen anything other than people being confused.
To be clear, if you look online at your broker and see one share of TSLA after the 5 for 1 split that isn't you being cheated. If you tell your broker to sell your five shares and he doesn't, then you may have been cheated (it depends on what rules you've agreed to for putting in orders and when they have to execute them). All the complaints I've seen don't involve any cheating, they are just people imagining that when they ask about their accounts that the information must be correct.
Don’t you worry your pretty little head; the Chinese got this.These people who keep choosing to develop hydrogen vehicles, are they incapable of performing simple arithmetic?
If the only ones who benefit from hydrogen cars are the oil companies creating the product at high inefficiencies, while the owners of hydrogen vehicles place themselves in harm's way for potentially explosive results at each refill of a vehicle that can't hope to match pure BEV efficiencies, who is the winner here?
How many people does BMW expect to fall for these fallacies and be unable to do the math for total cost of ownership over time? Enough to keep their books in the black? I don't think so.
What kind of BS do the oil companies spout to the OEMs who take up their idiotic proposition for Fool Cell manufacturing? (BMW, Toyota, etc.)
What financial incentives must have been offered along with that hydrogen fool cell song and dance in order for board members to vote for such foolishness which is all but guaranteed to sink the company they control?
This won't end well for those involved in promoting this "alternative" to pure BEVs.
Zipse, the CEO of BMW, is doubling down on his obvious strategic mistakes from the past, which I try to point out in many articles and newsletters for years. It is sad to see how desperately he tries to justify hydrogen and his 'one platform' approach that has put the company in a weak position. The "we've done everything right in the past" but reinvent us in 3 years completely statement is quite contradictory too. His outlook is pretty shocking as well.
So, essentially, what you are stating is that he doesn't know Zipse about successfully running a company?Zipse, the CEO of BMW, is doubling down on his obvious strategic mistakes from the past, which I try to point out in many articles and newsletters for years. It is sad to see how desperately he tries to justify hydrogen and his 'one platform' approach that has put the company in a weak position. The "we've done everything right in the past" but reinvent us in 3 years completely statement is quite contradictory too. His outlook is pretty shocking as well.
BMW is now at the top of my Darwin extinction list, and if they continue on their course, I wonder how long he will keep his role and keep BMW in business.