It does not stay there, though.We like noise around here.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It does not stay there, though.We like noise around here.
As usual I'm here to be the pessimistic sounding board, and Europe is currently in a much worse spot economically than North America.
anyone else sick of this guy
I think you give him too much credit.he did this so he could shake weak longs so he could scoop up discount shares for his fund
you are probably right ...I think you give him too much credit.
He's just a flake who's sentiment blows with the wind. He panics easily and seemingly recommends trading on lightly held sentiments.
Ross Gerber I think is trying to make a play for a board position for his own enrichment.
Both Gary and Ross have their own agendas, and as they serve their clients, they should never be confused with the interest we retail investors have. IMO they do some good analysis and some are completely off base. I've argued with both of them, e.g. about the so-called Twitter overhang, which I think is an illusion, about advertising, which Tesla doesn't need, or about the fact that they should join the board. Still, it's good to have them as they can communicate with the MSM and help correct the false narrative.anyone else sick of this guy
over the past several months he constantly drummed up the
he did this so he could shake weak longs so he could scoop up discount shares for his fund
- Twitter overhang narrative
- Tesla brand damage
- advertising needed
- sharebuyback when stock was much higher
now he has shifted to cheerleading and and focusing on positives ...
both him and Ross Gerber initially had my support but upon further review they do not represent retail holders as they claim to...
they are Wall St thieves pretending to care about retail investors plain and simple
“Tesla has taken the nuclear option to bully the weaker, thin margin players off the table,” Bill Russo, a spokesperson for Shanghai-based industry consultancy Automobility, told Reuters.
anyone else sick of this guy
over the past several months he constantly drummed up the
he did this so he could shake weak longs so he could scoop up discount shares for his fund
- Twitter overhang narrative
- Tesla brand damage
- advertising needed
- sharebuyback when stock was much higher
now he has shifted to cheerleading and and focusing on positives ...
both him and Ross Gerber initially had my support but upon further review they do not represent retail holders as they claim to...
they are Wall St thieves pretending to care about retail investors plain and simple
So if they do that anyone can file an NHTSA complaint and get their soundmaker recalled? (Since a given model/year of an EV vehicle can only make one sound and the driver isn't allowed to change it. Unless of course that is the sound they always make.)Remember when making too much noise with a Tesla was recalled because of safety?
Tesla is asked to disable Boombox feature when in drive, NHTSA deems it a safety risk
Tesla was hit by yet another recall today as NHTSA asked the automaker to disable its Boombox feature, which allows...electrek.co
I think Ross was in favor of the Twitter acquisition, wasn't he? I don't think he was a fan of some of Elon's tweets.Both Gary and Ross have their own agendas, and as they serve their clients, they should never be confused with the interest we retail investors have. IMO they do some good analysis and some are completely off base. I've argued with both of them, e.g. about the so-called Twitter overhang, which I think is an illusion, about advertising, which Tesla doesn't need, or about the fact that they should join the board. Still, it's good to have them as they can communicate with the MSM and help correct the false narrative.
When your fund is down 40% for 2022, the last thing you wanna do is to "shake out weak longs."anyone else sick of this guy
over the past several months he constantly drummed up the
he did this so he could shake weak longs so he could scoop up discount shares for his fund
- Twitter overhang narrative
- Tesla brand damage
- advertising needed
- sharebuyback when stock was much higher
now he has shifted to cheerleading and and focusing on positives ...
both him and Ross Gerber initially had my support but upon further review they do not represent retail holders as they claim to...
they are Wall St thieves pretending to care about retail investors plain and simple
Probably not considering they are all half assing it.I wonder if the other DCFC providers are concerned.
anyone else sick of this guy
over the past several months he constantly drummed up the
he did this so he could shake weak longs so he could scoop up discount shares for his fund
- Twitter overhang narrative
- Tesla brand damage
- advertising needed
- sharebuyback when stock was much higher
now he has shifted to cheerleading and and focusing on positives ...
both him and Ross Gerber initially had my support but upon further review they do not represent retail holders as they claim to...
they are Wall St thieves pretending to care about retail investors plain and simple
Tesla doesn't count them as sold until delivered to a customer, so some percentage of those in transit will have customers already. Possibly a high percentage. Inventory in transit is not the same as inventory on a lot. And each showroom should have one of each for demos or immediate sale.Well yeah not yet being matched to a buyer is the definition of an inventory item, or are you saying these vehicles are listed for purchase right now but are actually sold and just in transit? I don't think the latter would be the case, the listings themselves are presented as individual VINs ready for buyers at their respective locations.
I have no doubt these were just in transit from China though. Whatever the listings represent in reality, I'm pretty sure the numbers were much lower recently and have nary been this high. Pretty sure anyways, I had been more focused on domestic numbers lately and those are still trending down for the 3/Y.
Jalopnik has always been negative on Tesla. They previously said that the Model S would never see production (among other negatives).Well, it was "According to Reuters" after all...
Right... "relieved" is probably more like it...Probably not considering they are all half assing it.
Around here, many cars and trucks are at least that loud. It's very annoying, but noise laws are not often enforced.How can this be legal? I live in a city and I like to sleep at night. It was not even okay even when drivers pretended their engine had to rattle only to propel tones of metal a few meters. We made laws to force EV to make noise even where there's not a person in sight. Maybe we should prevent cars to make unnecessary noise and let the world be at peace. Maybe?