That's a real challenge! I've heard of houses being devalued by having solar panel installations, and have a feeling they add no value to most properties for many prospective purchasers. This seems bizarre on the face of it, but I know of a couple of people who removed their PV systems when they sold their homes because they found that buyers weren't keen on having them.
As another data point, when we completed our self build in 2016, we had it valued, really just so we had an idea as to whether self-build had saved us much money (they answer was "not a lot"). The valuer we had around (a RICS chap) reduced his value by 5% because it was a passive house (i.e. very well insulated, air tight and effectively zero energy over the course of a year). I challenged him on this, and his reply was that "eco houses" were a niche market, and because of that there were fewer buyers prepared to purchase one, and fewer interested buyers meant reducing the value.
This may change as people start to place a higher value on house running costs and damage to the environment, but right now I suspect it's still the case that things like solar panels and battery storage systems are seen as a liability, rather than a benefit, by many. It's still the "bling" that sells houses and makes them more valuable, stuff like decent kitchens and bathrooms are much higher on the value scale than anything that reduces running costs.