EVDRVN
Active Member
I haven't noticed a huge decrease in range from heat. The HVAC is very efficient. The heater on the other hand is a different story.
There isn't one. In fact the warmer air is less drag than the cold.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I haven't noticed a huge decrease in range from heat. The HVAC is very efficient. The heater on the other hand is a different story.
People who has free supercharging are also part of the problem.Many CA SCs have 15-30 min wait times. Most of those are full of people that live a mile away and charge from 70-90%. The SC network was originally designed for travel but some are congested with these folks and Uber drivers, etc.
The end of free supercharging should definitely help out with that. I know power is expensive in CA but it is surprising that people will waste time to save a few bucks.Many CA SCs have 15-30 min wait times. Most of those are full of people that live a mile away and charge from 70-90%. The SC network was originally designed for travel but some are congested with these folks and Uber drivers, etc.
That makes sense. I drove from SF to LA during the summer a few time through 100F+ and I didn't notice a negative impact on my range. Driving 70mph+ did.There isn't one. In fact the warmer air is less drag than the cold.
I'm getting a rate of 13 cents per KwH during off peak time. It comes out to about 3 cents a mile.The end of free supercharging should definitely help out with that. I know power is expensive in CA but it is surprising that people will waste time to save a few bucks.
One day this will be true, but for now, long road trips I am still better off in an ICE. I am a bit of road warrior, and will cover off 900miles in a day easily. With maybe 30min of total not driving time. You can't pull that off in an EV and as you say where you charge is not always the place you want to take breaks.
We are not far off from the EV being the better road trip option for most people, just not there yet.
There definitely will always be people who will prefer ICE, just like how there are people who still prefer a stick shift. But those people will be in the minority, so the statement about the death of ICE is true. They will still exist, but very rarely.For the long range warriors, the diesel, with a huge tank is still the champ, but then you get stuck driving a diesel with a huge tank
Driving an EV changes people. They begin to enjoy the journey, instead of racing to the destination. Road warriors arrive beaten up, exhausted, physically and mentally drained. For the end of the journey they are pretty unsafe to still be on the road. For some it is a badge of courage and accomplishment, but EV drives soon see the benefits of making frequent stops along the way.
For this reason, there will still be people that will want an ICE vehicle with great range. The downside is that they will be polluting every single mile along the way.
For me, most voyages over 1,000 miles are best done by flying. Two hours in the air is better than 18 hours on the road.
Everyplace else, the EV gets the job done with grace and pace.
Years ago, I drove 900 miles in one day. It was an insane thing for me* to do and I would never do it again. Before the end, I was exhausted and had become a real danger to myself and others. I tell “most people” that I drove over 600 miles in a day and they’re impressed. Even that isn’t something most people would do. For most people, 900 miles in a day is WAY outside the envelope of things they would ever consider doing. It isn’t something with a statistically significant effect on EV adoption.
* Not saying driving like that isn’t something YOU can’t do safely. I don’t know you and recognize that some people can do things I can’t.
Driving 900 miles in a single day with only 30 minutes of break time might be dangerous for most drivers. In many jurisdictions there are rules that limit the amount of driving commercial drivers do for this reason.
Multiple drivers, so no big deal really. It is only 12ishhrs on the road, so a couple 3 hour shifts. I tend to drive 3 hrs a day around the city between commuting and go to meetings, so 3-4 hrs at one time on the highway is no issue. Get out stretch, change drivers, repeat.
I wouldn't want to sit 12 hours in a car with only 30 minutes of breaks, even if I didn't have to drive at all. When my wife and I moved from Houston to the Boston area, we drove a rental moving track for four days to cover 1850 miles and it was exhausting even though we split the driving.
Good way to end up in the hospital (or morgue) with a blood clot.I am a bit of road warrior, and will cover off 900miles in a day easily. With maybe 30min of total not driving time.
No. There are 5 superchargers on that route. I’m glad I’m not your guest. As much as I’d want to see all those great places, if someone took me on a death march like that, I’d never come back!I would run into problems on the very first day. From Bay Area to Santa Barbara on Highway 1. There are 2 chargers on the way, one in Gilroy and one in SLO. We never stop at any of these locations. Same applies for most of the days on the trip.
Second issue: heat in the desert decreases the range, and there are very few chargers there.
That does make me miss having gears. Even in the US some of the highways in the midwest are limited at 75mph, with most going well above that. It would be nice to have a gear kick in at 70 and gain some efficiency back at high speeds. (I know most of the loss is due to wind resistance but that would have to help)not to mention in europe there are still serious range issues due to the fast speed of cars.
And I love doing it! I always love a good road trip. I find it super relaxing. Good music, good conversation, hopefully good scenery.
You caused your inconvenience by "starting with a lower than typical charge". It is simple to avoid these problems and most do.[