-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
Cause I know your strong and can handle it!Why you coming for me like that?
Also worth pointing out... uncertainty and volatility lower market values. Certainty and stability raise them. You want to buy during uncertainty and volatility.
Options Sniper on Twitter posted this a couple hours ago. It is NOT even TSLA specific. This guy is pretty good at what he does.
"signing off here. nothing to watch/trade. not a day/week or even month for small acct owners for sure. take a rest and stay away from mkt. this is not game for u. survival always first priority - no reason trading in this kind of mkt."
Option_Sniper (@option_snipper) | Twitter
"signing off here. nothing to watch/trade. not a day/week or even month for small acct owners for sure. take a rest and stay away from mkt. this is not game for u. survival always first priority - no reason trading in this kind of mkt."
Option_Sniper (@option_snipper) | Twitter
Partly agree, but remember the markets are about efficient allocation of capital. If you’re not allowed to short or to force bankruptcy then we end up with zombie companiies like in Japan.
RobStark
Well-Known Member
Chevy's 2019 Silverado with 4-cylinder engine rated at 21 mpg combined
BTW Subaru does have a hardcore following that has been growing for 10+ years. But Subaru engines suck ###, they consume way too much oil.
BTW Subaru does have a hardcore following that has been growing for 10+ years. But Subaru engines suck ###, they consume way too much oil.
that just seems unnatural to me, unless the company is misleading/hiding pertinent financial info, or acting maliciously..something to that affect. enron.
take this specific scenario below;
if a company is struggling to float in a rough economy, blazing a new trail, or entering a fiercely competitive environment, etc...
but NOT lying or hiding anything from all stakeholders (...not just shareholders), it’s bullshit that speculators can collude in attempt to force bankruptcy.
fair or unfair, can’t cry about it, bc it isn’t going away. can call it capitalism, but really its kinda bullshit. there’s million arguments to be made either way, i get it!
but in this specific case i laid out, the ‘short’ is not a stakeholder. rather an anti stakeholder..a parasite, a cancer.
it’s unreasonable, and a built in monopoly-enabling advantage for legacy competition.
i’m not anti-cap or anything.
i’m in a fiercely competitive market myself. not looking for free-bies. we stay ahead/alive thru innovation.
just saying that scenario about doesn’t seem right. sadly, don’t know a great solution. the market works pretty decently most of time
depending on what you paid for the jan300 (it was 16$ earlier today) could be a nice little bet. If she pops to 30-35$ after ER I'd dump it.
Maybe Tesla can buy them in 5 years and start the conversion process.
That scenario isn't capitalism, it is an oligarchy essentially price/product fixing the entire market.
Well, at a .89 beta, that doesn't really bear truth.The difference between Tesla's decline today and NASDAQ's has now been eliminated. A win for Tesla, given that TSLA amplifies macro movements.
Thanks, T. Rowe
I'm guessing Fahmi Quadir. Her name only gets 3500 hits on Google. Apparently her claim to fame was that she was in some Netflix documentary.
I'm sorry, but these "(Person A) predicted (Event B)" stories, beyond being a transparent attempt to smear or boost the target they're shorting or betting on via comparison to B, are nonsense. Anyone who's been in the market for a while will be able to point to cases that they predicted correctly when their prediction wasn't a mainstream view. And even if this wasn't the case on an individual level, there would be, among the millions of people making individual stock investments, a huge number of people who guessed right (even if at random) who can then be hailed for being correct and use their correct (even if random) success in the past be used for evidence as to why their current position is a shoo-in.
I liked this tweet,
vistacruiser7 on Twitter
.@mayemusk @danahull very same day Bloomberg decided a Tesla $650,000 outstanding tax bill to NV warranted a story Bloomberg was silent about a public talk w/NV governor where Musk shared new goal to double aim of NV Tesla employment from 10K to 20K https://electrek.co/2018/10/10/tesla-gigafactory-1-employees-housing-elon-musk/ … $tsla
vistacruiser7 on Twitter
.@mayemusk @danahull very same day Bloomberg decided a Tesla $650,000 outstanding tax bill to NV warranted a story Bloomberg was silent about a public talk w/NV governor where Musk shared new goal to double aim of NV Tesla employment from 10K to 20K https://electrek.co/2018/10/10/tesla-gigafactory-1-employees-housing-elon-musk/ … $tsla
X Fan
Active Member
sigh....the cabal pops their head up again...
btw: TSLA with a big comeback......
I disagree, since they're going to not only end the EV credit but also start taxing EVs more. Considering the amount of subsidy ICE get already, removing the EV incentive is a terrible idea. I don't mean for Tesla - it will be fine, even if perhaps a few people next year pick one less option or have to not buy the car, there will be others for long enough that they will continue to be supply constrained until well past when their tax credit fadeout would have occurred. But we need to incentivize the rest to step up. We need the EV credit, and we need the EPA to actually be the god damned EPA and get the efficiency requirements back on track, and perhaps even more aggressive, in line with the trend in the rest of the world.
Ya, if this trend continues, we might just end the day green. Remarkable, given the rest of the market.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
- Poll
