tivoboy
Active Member
god please no.I thought I heard EM saying the ModY will have falcon-wing doors.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
god please no.I thought I heard EM saying the ModY will have falcon-wing doors.
Different reasons for all.. domestic, it's a demand, finance and business model issue. The international firms (and FCAU included) it' a European emissions fallout and new emissions regulatory issue. Domestically, we're not going to have that problem as the current administration doesn't believe that vehicle emissions are a problem for city inhabitants or the environment.Ford and Daimler and even GM are making yearly lows
But at just 3.5% interest rate, the savings still made sense even if I waited 10 years, costing just $350 (in simple interest) or saving $750 (ya this car's a keeper). .
*Every single* electric car is developing waiting lists.
Probably not as it was just banter between co-hosts.Is there a clip?
magic eight ball says "possible"Daily low, $254,22...
Geez, will I actually get into my mid-$240s cutoff for buying more shares?
It was stated at one point (on an earnings call?) that not very many people were actually buying the FSD package. I'm trying to remember the percentage they stated. It was 15% or less, I know that. This means the maximum exposure is something like $75 million, but probably significantly less. Some people paid $3000 rather than $5000 for the FSD reservation, and I do think 15% was an overestimate -- *and* the quote about how many people were buying it is out of date and I think far fewer people have been buying it as time goes on. And many of the people who bought it won't ask for a refund and will wait indefinitely. So a more plausible exposure level is probably under $40 million.I think it could be in the region of $200 - $300 million so maybe too much for the attorneys (although they are California attorneys........).
But that's just from 5 minutes looking at the filings so I could be off. Will take a closer look tomorrow.
Demand (in NA) may still be an issue if people simply don't know about Model 3. Considering we had 400k orders at some point and suppose, half was NA (200k), Tesla already delivered 100k of expensive LR+PUP trims; some of these were new customers w/o reservations. I also suspect that the prior LR demand from the NA line is taken care of or will be by the end of Oct.Yeah, because it's the most idiotic argument ever.
Canadian EV Demand Is So Strong That Customers Wait Months On Lists
*Every single* electric car is developing waiting lists. People may have a first choice, but many will compromise and go for the car they can get. At worst, Tesla might have an issue with a bad product mix -- like they did when too many people wanted AWD rather than RWD!
Demand will become an issue around the time when EVs constitute 50% of the world market, at which point EV makers will finally actually be competing against each other. We've got a few years before that happens (FYI, should be roughly 2026)
By the way...welcome back NerodenIt was stated at one point (on an earnings call?) that not very many people were actually buying the FSD package. I'm trying to remember the percentage they stated. It was 15% or less, I know that. This means the maximum exposure is something like $75 million, but probably significantly less. Some people paid $3000 rather than $5000 for the FSD reservation, and I do think 15% was an overestimate -- *and* the quote about how many people were buying it is out of date and I think far fewer people have been buying it as time goes on. And many of the people who bought it won't ask for a refund and will wait indefinitely. So a more plausible exposure level is probably under $40 million.
When the supplier goes out of business, it's a problem for the OEM.Just bought 100 share 254.60, I say screw it what is short term downside 200 , If it happens I don’t care, Bloomberg article suppliers payment issues is just total BS, who has upper hand at this point Tesla or suppliers ?, suppliers are lining up to work for Tesla because growth is huge, some suppliers demand payment sooner, Tesla will hand them a check with warning we will find alternative to you.
You are going to lose your shirt investing if you keep making that assumption. I usually assume that most companies are run by idiots -- sometimes idiots savants, but still idiots -- and I've done very well.i usually assume that most companies (that includes Tesla) are not run by idiots.
That depends on what supplier.When the supplier goes out of business, it's a problem for the OEM.
Probably not today - the market is up.Daily low, $254,22...
Geez, will I actually get into my mid-$240s cutoff for buying more shares?
Oh. Yeah, of course they are. Traditionally, the way really big, really good day traders got out of this trap was to buy a seat on the stock exchange, and then trade as much as they liked without commissions.Nube comment. Seeking to learn...
The stock seems to go through a daily cycle where it gets hammered hard every 20 mins or so for the first two hours, then quietly bought up again in the afternoon. So unless there's a good news event, it finishes down. I've tried trading on the daily cycle, hoping to make them pay for their disregard for progress, but meagre winnings get eaten by commissions.
Anybody out there beating the shorts on the daily downswing?
Consensus among those who pay attention is that Tesla's currently short on battery cells, while pack production and car production is going faster. (This is new. Something else was always the bottleneck before.) So they're making cars with fewer cells so they can keep the car production rate up.Consensus on the MR move? Seems like LR RWD was lagging in sales and this is a bridge to the SR car.