Question I’ve had on my mind for a bit, my apologies if it is an ignorant question.
Remember the saying attributed to J. Paul Getty “If you owe the bank $100 that's your problem. If you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem.”
Let’s say you’re a big enough player that your broker allowed you to use shares, say NVDA, as collateral in your margin account against your billion dollar TSLA short position(s).
TSLA has gone from $250 to $350, meanwhile NVDA has gone from $289 to $164.
Is it possible some large shorts simply *cannot* cover and they or their brokerage can only kick the can down the road praying for reprieve? Is this or some similar variant a credible scenario? If so, what’s a viable strategy (besides stalling with FUD, yada, yada) for them, if any?
Remember the saying attributed to J. Paul Getty “If you owe the bank $100 that's your problem. If you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem.”
Let’s say you’re a big enough player that your broker allowed you to use shares, say NVDA, as collateral in your margin account against your billion dollar TSLA short position(s).
TSLA has gone from $250 to $350, meanwhile NVDA has gone from $289 to $164.
Is it possible some large shorts simply *cannot* cover and they or their brokerage can only kick the can down the road praying for reprieve? Is this or some similar variant a credible scenario? If so, what’s a viable strategy (besides stalling with FUD, yada, yada) for them, if any?