Notified mine and accepted with no excess to pay.And, does it have to be declared to insurers? If so, did it impact the premium BB ?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Notified mine and accepted with no excess to pay.And, does it have to be declared to insurers? If so, did it impact the premium BB ?
My -not a solicitor- take on this is that you are not making any changes from the manufacturer specs by purchasing this extra, so they would have a hard time considering this is a modification from the factory model… but… insurers… sneaky b***s as always…And, does it have to be declared to insurers? If so, did it impact the premium BB ?
Interesting I wonder if they have mine, I emailed them yesterdaySo update on Zen (Zenith) Autos. They have around 300 Model Y's at Aston Bentley's yard in Donnington. AB are managing the onward delivery to customers. Mine will be heading south to me on Monday 11th.
I can imagine there will be plenty of chrome M3 owners ready to do a swap if that is feasible?But aside, I kind of regret this. Unless you are going for an ‘all-black’ look I find chrome looks better with all other colours, especially MSM and looks classier.
The chrome delete trend was mostly popular among racer boys / sports car, and I believe it is starting to die down.
But to each his own I guess…
Anyway, it was easier to do an aftermarket chrome delete than it would be to do a ‘chrome add’ - not even sure that’s a thing at all actually.
Has anyone tried or has any idea on how to achieve this?
That would maybe work for door handles, but not the window trims on the Y, sadlyI can imagine there will be plenty of chrome M3 owners ready to do a swap if that is feasible?
May be worth looking into via the sale/want ads?
That is very debatable but even if that argument is accepted you are unlikely to get financial recovery for AB if they don’t know about it (not that telling them automatically gives you loss cover for it).My -not a solicitor- take on this is that you are not making any changes from the manufacturer specs by purchasing this extra, so they would have a hard time considering this is a modification from the factory model… but… insurers… sneaky b***s as always…
That is very debatable but even if that argument is accepted you are unlikely to get financial recovery for AB if they don’t know about it (not that telling them automatically gives you loss cover for it).
As it is changing the performance of the vehicle and making you a potentially higher risk driver - I am sure they would expect you to declare this resulting with possibly higher premium - or in the event of an unfortunate incident you may risk being declined for any claimAnd, does it have to be declared to insurers? If so, did it impact the premium BB ?
Spec please? 3 or Y?So today the date moved from September to end of December. Ordered in March. Looked at the website and seen they are offering new cars from Jan to March 2023. I really dont understand there estimations. How can a go that has been on order since March - arrive a couple of weeks before a car that is ordered now.
Is it changing the performance of the vehicle though?As it is changing the performance of the vehicle and making you a potentially higher risk driver - I am sure they would expect you to declare this resulting with possibly higher premium - or in the event of an unfortunate incident you may risk being declined for any claim
Good point! however it is changing the original acceleration on specs and most importantly red flagging the driver as a high risk driver - at least this is my understanding of the insurance world but I am not an expert by any means. In the new era of high tech software based vehicles probably there is room for interpretation - we will all find out along the wayIs it changing the performance of the vehicle though?
It’s always been there, you are simply unlocking it with a software upgrade. Very different from let’s say, remapping done completely against manufacturer recommendations and programming.
Otherwise I would argue EAP/FSD enhancements need to be declared too.
yes. Ultimately that’s the most reasonable choice. Not necessarily fair but with insurers it’s always best to add as much unnecessary details to avoid being caught out.I can see both sides of the argument but regardless I'd be telling my insurance anyway. They'll do anything to avoid paying out, I wouldn't want to risk it.
My concern would not be having the cost of the boost being reinstated, it's surely just a matter of switching over to the new car in case of a total loss.That is very debatable but even if that argument is accepted you are unlikely to get financial recovery for AB if they don’t know about it (not that telling them automatically gives you loss cover for it).
That might depend on what your ordered! What did you order in March?How can a go that has been on order since March - arrive a couple of weeks before a car that is ordered now.
I would want to believe your rationale but, is the cost of insuring a MY P the same as a LR? If an ICE manufacturer offered a 1.5l diesel option and 2.5l V6 petrol, would you expect to pay the same insurance premium? If not, why not? Performance maybe!?My -not a solicitor- take on this is that you are not making any changes from the manufacturer specs by purchasing this extra, s
Tesla doesn't allow AB to be moved - it stays and dies with the car. Same with EAP and FSD. It would need to be re-purchased.My concern would not be having the cost of the boost being reinstated, it's surely just a matter of switching over to the new car in case of a total loss.