[UK] 2024.14.x

[Andy H]

Yes I’ve noticed that it also doesn’t seem to need about 23 miles of clear road to get from 60mph to 70mph when your lane clears of a slower moving car. It accelerates quicker and the speed it does this now seems well judged, quick enough to get up to the set speed but not too quick that it’s comfortable and smooth to passengers.

Not sure if they deserve congratulations on fixing something they should have got right years ago of course but nice none the less.

Yes!

It does seem better in this regard. A smidge more would be nice.

Also I had not just my first successful M4 to M25 transition ever on EAP, it then went on to do the M25 to M1 too!

 

[HenryT]

The update has changed a setting. I think it's under lights. I can't remember exactly what it says, but switch it off and it should fix it.

Thanks @Alex987854 and others ref the indicators. It was exactly as you said that 'auto cancel' had somehow been enabled in one of the updates. Switched it off and car now behaves as it should.

 

[init6]

Drove up the A90 the other day so got to try the new average speed functionality. Overall, It's a nice addition. Handy to see what you're current average is between the two cameras and the distance to the next one.

It doesn't yet handle simultaneous sections of average speed cameras though. The A90 is average speed for about 60 miles, with cameras roughly every 10 miles. It would work for cameras 1 and 2, 3 and 4 etc. but not for cameras 2 and 3, 4 and 5...

Hopefully that will get resolved.

I'm just back from an A90 trip and noticed that the bit between Dundee and Stonehaven is not treated as one single Average speed zone but is in 3 chunks. From Dundee to a couple of miles south of Laurencekirk is one section, the 50mph section at Laurencekirk and finally a mile or so north of Laurencekirk. If you believe the car there's a few miles either side of Laurencekirk where you're not being measured by the Average Speed Camera.

I also had the same experience as @Overworked The average was calculated for the whole section and not between individual cameras. On the Dunblane to Broxden leg I got stuck behind a lorry overtaking a lorry which brought my average to low 60s by the time I passed the next camera. Between that camera and the next one I was doing a steady 72, but the average still showed low to mid 60s. So a little less useful than it could have been, but still very handy info to have.

Edit: just did the same typo as Overworked

 

[Medved_77]

I'm just back from an A90 trip and noticed that the bit between Dundee and Stonehaven is not treated as one single Average speed zone but is in 3 chunks. From Dundee to a couple of miles south of Laurencekirk is one section, the 50mph section at Laurencekirk and finally a mile or so north of Laurencekirk. If you believe the car there's a few miles either side of Laurencekirk where you're not being measured by the Average Speed Camera.

I also had the same experience as @Overworked The average was calculated for the whole section and not between individual cameras. On the Dunblane to Broxden leg I got stuck behind a lorry overtaking a lorry which brought my average to low 60s by the time I passed the next camera. Between that camera and the next one I was doing a steady 72, but the average still showed low to mid 60s. So a little less useful than it could have been, but still very handy info to have.

Edit: just did the same typo as Overworked

Thanks. I'm up and down again this weekend so will have a chance to test again, although this time on 20.1.

 

[RajG]

Seems like the 2024.20.1 has slowed down. any visible improvements to the adaptive headlights at all?

 

[Utumno]

Seems like the 2024.20.1 has slowed down. any visible improvements to the adaptive headlights at all?

Yes, the cornering feature is good.

 

[RajG]

2024.20.1 downloading

 

[DCCT]

2024.20.1 downloading

Same here, M3H RWD!

 

[MrBadger]

2024.20.1 downloading

Same here, M3H RWD!

Try
Thread '[UK] 2024.20 Software Update'
[UK] 2024.20 Software Update

 

[batfinkus]

General software related query - how long does it take to install this? I’m picking up a second hand Sep 2022 3LR tomorrow, from the photos it’s on 2024.8.9, and has already downloaded 2024.14.9 ready to install, I did ask the dealer to update it but they said they couldn’t do that I’ve about a 450 mile drive home (and a ferry) but will have plenty of stops, I just don’t want to start the update if it’s going to take a couple of hours?

 

[spdpsba]

I’ve about a 450 mile drive home (and a ferry) but will have plenty of stops, I just don’t want to start the update if it’s going to take a couple of hours?

Why would you update when you are travelling? It is not a good idea to install/update while you are on the raod as updates sometime break a normal working function (never happened to me but you can see stories here) Go home and then update - you are not missing anything important other than cornering effect of the adaptive lights.

 

[MrBadger]

It also means that if anything is found to be wrong with car on way home then the dealer can’t blame it on the software update you just installed.

Also by the time you have updated to 2024.14.9 it will be wanting to download 2024.20.x. Save yourself some time and just wait until 2024.20.x is offered - and imho a few weeks on top of that while 2024.20.y.z is offered.

Software updates are cumulative. You don’t have to install 2024.14.x and 2024.20.x - the single latter one will do.

 

[RajG]

agree, don’t install anything till you get home /a safe place. Software installs on Tesla can take anywhere between 15-40 mins approx. And also don’t attempt to open doors whilst the update install is in progress.I had this encounter where the windows did not slide down and rubbed against the window sill. I think that issue is fixed now, but I wouldn’t do that ever, to be on the safe side. you would need wifi/ phone tethering for the software to download.

 

[batfinkus]

Sounds good to me, I’ll just get it to do the updates when we get home