Yep, almost as many as those that are experts at reading “true intent” into for-profit corporate decisions. For all of the supposed “future” benefits or current “issues” with combo detection issues, one thing that’s not up for debate is not having radar is cheaper to make/produce than having it. And there’s is ZERO outsider ability to determine which motivating factor was strongest (immediate cost savings/parts availability vs. actual “technical” superiority). IMHO it’s extremely likely a current step backwards in current (and potentially long-term) capabilities made for near-term profit reasons. Expert or not, I’ve been involved in enough high-level product development corporate decisions over the decades to be able to spot spin when I see it…and there’s a lot of it going on around this topic.