@randall_s Hmm. Thanks for the links. That is very odd that they say (but still don't reference why) that all families of all of the vastly different chemistries have EXACTLY the same minimum temperature for discharge. That seems like an insane coincidence. How can lead acid, NiCd, and lithium ion all have that exact same coincidental temperature cutoff point? Those battery chemistries don't behave the same in dozens of other characteristics, and I would like to see a reason why they line up on this.
The second article had something funny. It had this sentence:
"However, lead acid batteries will experience similar discharging problems as charging problems."
And the phrase in the middle, "experience similar discharging problems" was highlighted as a hyperlink. I thought, "Oh, finally, something will tell why this is." Nope. That link...goes back to the top of the page of that very article. Unhelpful.
So this still gets to my original premise. When a statement is disproven by evidence, the statement needs further explanation or justification. Lead acid batteries do operate at temperatures lower than that cutoff point, so why is that still claimed? Is it one of those statements that isn't fully fleshed out, like, "They can be safely operated without damage down to this temperature." I would certainly understand if that were the case, that lead acid batteries can operate colder, but suffer from noticeable damage and short life. Maybe that's what they mean but isn't being stated.