Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

2017 Investor Roundtable:General Discussion

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Chris Lattner just updated his Resume to include his time at Tesla - Interesting reading... • r/teslamotors

Work History

Tesla

VP Autopilot Software

January 30 - June 20, 2017

When I joined Tesla, it was in the midst of a hardware transition from "Hardware 1" Autopilot (based primarily on MobileEye for vision processing) to "Hardware 2", which uses an in-house designed TeslaVision stack. The team was facing many tough challenges given the nature of the transition. My primary contributions over these fast five months were:

  • We evolved Autopilot for HW2 from its first early release (which had few features and was limited to 45mph on highways) to effectively parity with HW1, and surpassing it in some ways (e.g. silky smooth control).
  • This required building and shipping numerous features for HW2, including: support for local roads, Parallel Autopark, High Speed Autosteer, Summon, Lane Departure Warning, Automatic Lane Change, Low Speed AEB, Full Speed Autosteer, Pedal Misapplication Mitigation, Auto High Beams, Side Collision Avoidance, Full Speed AEB, Perpendicular Parking, and 'silky smooth' performance.
  • This was done by shipping a total of 7 major feature releases, as well as numerous minor releases to support factory, service, and other narrow markets.
  • One of Tesla's huge advantages in the autonomous driving space is that it has thousands of cars already on the road. We built infrastructure to take advantage of this, allowing the collection of image and video data from this fleet, as well as building big data infrastructure in the cloud to process and use it.
  • I defined and drove the feature roadmap, drove the technical architecture for future features, and managed the implementation for the next exciting features to come.
  • I personally advocated and drove a major rewrite of the deep net architecture in the vision stack, leading to significantly better precision, recall, and inference performance.
  • I effectively stopped regretted attrition from the team, and ended up growing it by over 50%. I personally interviewed most of the accepted candidates.
  • Made massive improvments to internal infrastructure and processes that I cannot go into detail about.
In the end, Elon and I agreed that he and I did not work well together and that I should leave, so I did. ***

Overall I learned a lot, worked my butt off, met a lot of great people, and had a lot of fun. I'm still a firm believer in Tesla, its mission, and the exceptional Autopilot team: I wish them well.

----------------


***this line was later edited out.
 
FWIW -

The team of ~10 SA contributors, who bash Tesla and respond to every positive comment with a lengthy negative response, has started targeting Jeff Dahn's relationship with Tesla.

The following is a direct quote from who appears to be their leader:

"I would suggest VA read and listen to the Dahn interviews, in which he acknowledges that any (marginal) battery improvements he is able to suggest are several years down the road from implementation."

I have listened to Jeff Dahn's interviews, in which Jeff points to significant improvements that are being implemented in Tesla's products now.

It is not surprising that the FUD Montana Skeptic is trying to spread is the direct opposite of facts.

What is surprising, however, is that they are now targeting Jeff Dahn.

We may get a big announcement around batter tech soon.
 
Last edited:
Tesla snubs J.D. Power for Initial Quality Study data

DETROIT -- How do the quality ratings for the 2017 Tesla Model S and Model X compare to competitors?

They don't, based off J.D. Power's 2017 U.S. Initial Quality Study that was released Wednesday. That's not because Tesla Inc. doesn't make quality vehicles, but because it doesn't allow J.D. Power access to its customer registration data for the survey.
And...
Doesn't feel the paying the subscription fee either.

FireAway!
 
I know, right? I'm tired of hearing "we will produce an electric car" without saying *how many* or *at what price*.

My guess is that a lot of these "will-produce" cars will never be produced, because price will not be anything close to that of a Model 3, autonomous features will not be anything close to that of a Model 3, range will not be anything close to that of a Model 3, and so on.

Maybe Audi may make a car that looks better, just priced $10k more, goes 50 miles per charge less, and can't drive itself until 2021.

Maybe Audi will sell 10 of these...

20, if they keep aggressively advertising two years in advance by trolling Elon.
 
Last edited:
My top-down analysis, in another thread, based on the size of the world markets and reasonable guesses regarding Tesla's ability to capture marketshare long term, comes out out at $0.5T - $1.5T. Anything beyond that would assume either outlandish levels of marketshare which would likely cause antitrust investigations (if they could even get that high before Chinese competitors took market share), which seems unlikely; or moving in on a totally new business beyond energy generation, storage, and transporation, which seems too speculative.

Apple is $750B, and growing, without much antitrust attention.

Note that the size of the world market will grow ~35% in ten years. This alone means $1T+ Tesla market cap for similar size vs. global GDP.

Given that Tesla's TAM > Apple's, and its growth rate is multiple times of Apple's ever was, I expect your estimate to prove conservative.
 
Apple is $750B, and growing, without much antitrust attention.

Market share invites antitrust action not market cap.

Apple is 34% US smart phone market share but about half that world wide.

In the 60's when GM crested past 60% US market share Congress started sniffing around.

Then GM began its long decline to below 17% US market share.
 
  • Like
Reactions: neroden
upload_2017-6-22_9-2-53.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.