You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You need a different GF dude... just kidding. My wife loooves her MYP btw. Joking aside, I'm curious what's holding your GF back?My GF REALLY wants an ID4. We already have my 2022 MYP, and I've been trying to convince her to take it so I can get an M3P.
But so far, I have not been winning the battle.
Apparently she had a Passat and a VW Bug that she just loved, so she thinks the ID4 deserves serious consideration......You need a different GF dude... just kidding. My wife loooves her MYP btw. Joking aside, I'm curious what's holding your GF back?
And the labor unions, who have seats on the VW board, certainly didn't like him talking about job losses. He was a little too much 'bull in the china shop' for the staid VW owners (primarily the Piech and Porsche families).It's a little more complicated with than that with Diess' departure, but essentially VAG didn't like the direction he was pushing VW which was to become more like Tesla then not.
I think the traditional makers underestimated vastly the complexity of the software stack, an area in which they have no expertise historically.Out of pure curiosity, I checked a few of the Puget Sound VW dealers for ID.4 availability. Every single ID.4 listed has a "reserved" notation, most are still "in transit" listings.
"Hey there potential customer we'd love to sell you a car but nope, get in a huge line of backorders, have a good day!"
It defies logic.
I tend to agree. Advanced software is a challenge for large traditional companies that previously dealt more with hardware (cars in this case). If they need more advanced software they tend to farm it out to software companies which often doesn't work out very well. It's very difficult for them to establish their own in-house software group and hire the talent needed. The lure of stock options at a startup company with a good idea can be very tempting for top talent.I think the traditional makers underestimated vastly the complexity of the software stack, an area in which they have no expertise historically.
Given valuations, the inverse is far likelier - Tesla buying a distressed ICE to get their dealer network (sales/service/parts). Can't see it happening but given Tesla's market cap, none of the ICE can afford them, not by a long shot.I'm not saying that means Tesla will get bought out someday by a large ICE company, but I wouldn't rule it out. Obviously, it would be very expensive at today's stock prices.
A dealer network adds nothing of value for Tesla. If you break down what a dealer network is, well, that’s land, buildings, people, and parts distribution.Tesla buying a distressed ICE to get their dealer network (sales/service/parts).
hmm I remember working with Xilinx and ALtera tools years ago.I tend to agree. Advanced software is a challenge for large traditional companies that previously dealt more with hardware (cars in this case). If they need more advanced software they tend to farm it out to software companies which often doesn't work out very well. It's very difficult for them to establish their own in-house software group and hire the talent needed. The lure of stock options at a startup company with a good idea can be very tempting for top talent.
As an analogy, I worked for a semiconductor startup which made field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). Large established semi companies tried to compete but failed due the the complicated software required to configure the FPGA and program the device. Once the large semi companies failed to compete with their own FPGA products, they ended up buying out the smaller startups that designed the products (hardware and software) in the first place. Examples are Intel buying Altera and AMD purchasing Xilinx. While Altera and Xilinx were once startups and had no semiconductor manufacturing capability, they did grow to be pretty large companies but still got bought out by even larger companies.
I'm not saying that means Tesla will get bought out someday by a large ICE company, but I wouldn't rule it out. Obviously, it would be very expensive at today's stock prices.
We're far afield from the topic so one last from me and I'll stop:A dealer network adds nothing of value for Tesla. If you break down what a dealer network is, well, that’s land, buildings, people, and parts distribution.
Tesla would rather buy some low-rent industrial warehouse to fix their cars-that’s pretty much where they are now and continue to be doing, not paying high rent on a place next to the freeway or across from a mall.
The people working in an ICE dealership know how to sell and fix ICE cars, and add nothing of value for Tesla. They would have to be re-trained, and probably begrudgingly. Better to just hire new people.
Parts distribution network? Tesla has their own. They have no need for subaru, toyota, ford, chevy distribution model and schedules. Worthless to them.
So, no, buying an ICE company would not make much sense for Tesla, or any other EV-only manufacturer.
I had a Jetta TDI - it was a good car. The problem wasn’t that they inflated the mileage but that they deflated the emissions!Let's just hope they don't inflate the EV mileage numbers like they did with their ICE car that caused them to have to compensate previous owners. Maybe they learned a lesson by that and get it right this time.
I have one on order and I met with the salesman as I have purchased from him before. They were doing two deliverIves the day I was there. He confirmed that they are not doing any mark ups, nor adding on any “dealer equipment”. They are charging whatever is on the MSRP for that vehicle which was a relief to hear. I will probably be getting a 2023 model out of the TN plant.Are the dealers marking up the ID.4's? There are many reports of this happening with Mach-E, Ionic5, EV6, Lightning.... Don't think I have heard much about the ID.4, however...