You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a Dana Hull piece, so I don't see it being FUD. The Medium post is also pretty gently worded, if it's FUD.I consider this to be a Bloomberg FUD article:
Tesla Employee Says Workers Contacted UAW About Organizing Plant
intriguing article on Seeking Alpha
" three particular things he said to look for in the Model 3
(floor, charge port, HUD) was helpful, and I certainly will look for them"
will batteries be vertical or horizontal (floor thickness and energy density
charge port (only use Tesla or add CCS ChaDeMo)
Heads up display or not.
nice researched article with info dense
http://seekingalpha.com/article/4048049-tesla-model-3-update-look
(author long)
but it does point out things to look for.He's still promoting ridiculous ideas about the battery pack, as I pointed out in the comments. Cells will be vertical, they won't charge to 5V, and his cell energy density projections are ridiculous. I also don't expect Tesla to have a barn door sized charge port or multiple charge ports, they'll use adapters.
but it does point out things to look for.
they do presently sell adapters for sure.
we shall have more info tonight though
did you look at other article? $40,000 loss per vehicle, looks like Anton W x2, eh
asked moderators to have the $40,000 verified or retracted, we shall see (which is a main thesis of the ?article?
agreed, it's a waste of time, i'm pretty much gone from SA and mostly here, retirement has advantages of more free time.Not necessarily on any of those points, in fact I doubt we'll get any of those types of details.
Didn't bother to read it, seemed like a waste of time.
I find that trying to refute utter nonsense like that point by point is about as effective as combating the "lizard-aliens control the world's politicians" theories. So I would discourage anyone from jumping in over at SA to try and reason.http://seekingalpha.com/article/4049370-tesla-capital-raise-now-bankruptcy-4-months
What do you guys think of this article?
If that site was more measured and less doom porn, it would be easier to take them seriously. While they're busy going down the rabbit hole of no expected sales increase in S/X the Model 3 sales are completely ignored, because it's "not gonna happen" or it's going to be "late." I anticipate 2H17 to be 80,000 cars, with the M3 numbers being roughly 30k of that. All attention is on M3, so they're going to postpone the S/X line improvements until later. Pure speculation on my part. Wild guessing, I can throw darts at a wall as good as any. And probably more accurate than Seeking Alpha.http://seekingalpha.com/article/4049370-tesla-capital-raise-now-bankruptcy-4-months
What do you guys think of this article?
http://seekingalpha.com/article/4049370-tesla-capital-raise-now-bankruptcy-4-months
What do you guys think of this article?
montana "skeptic"
look at the author, discussed elsewhere, a "lawyer" who "manage a $1B+ portfolio for a family office" hiding behind anononymity.
ie, Billion dollar fund manager, lawyer, anonymous, writing on SA for pennies and short long term putz/options who has used Ralph Vader/Keef Wivanoff/whompy wheelz/ (NHTSA reports pest) as a source for 1/3 of an article and very cozy with Mark B Spiegel (see twitter "comments") (and these are the positives)(thats about 20-30 strikes against it just for starters)(and trolls here on TMC report back to SA and him)
The supposedly-from-Montana author of that article is bringing discredit on the whole of Seeking Alpha. I've caught him on provably false statements of fact, but Seeking Alpha management seems to like supporting the guy who is knowingly lying. I have my doubts as to whether he is actually a lawyer.
I see seekingalpha.com in the address. Fake news.http://seekingalpha.com/article/4049370-tesla-capital-raise-now-bankruptcy-4-months
What do you guys think of this article?