J
jbcarioca
Guest
In a weird way I actually like this debate. Regardless of the precise price range of given "competitive" vehicles it is clear that different people have vastly different expectations of options, pricing ranges and equipment options. It's equally clear that among us we have vastly different views of what we would pay for and how. Just as in much of current political views in much of the world, those of us with oen view often view those of us with a different view as "wrong" or even "insane".
I'll happily wager that Tesla will accommodate most of those alternate views in their Model 3 pricing and options, just as they now do with Model S and X. It's no accident that they reintroduced the 60's, nor that they seem to be being very well received. It is quite natural that the P100D comes at about the same time with added opportunities to buy "Bioweapon Defense Mode".
So, I have no problem with your view. You'll have Model 3 for a price you agree with. Those who "want it all" will have the chance to buy a Model 3 that probably exceeds your 'insane' limit. Nobody will be forced to buy it!
I'll happily wager that Tesla will accommodate most of those alternate views in their Model 3 pricing and options, just as they now do with Model S and X. It's no accident that they reintroduced the 60's, nor that they seem to be being very well received. It is quite natural that the P100D comes at about the same time with added opportunities to buy "Bioweapon Defense Mode".
...
$80k for the M3 ( in my opinion ) would be insane..l.
So, I have no problem with your view. You'll have Model 3 for a price you agree with. Those who "want it all" will have the chance to buy a Model 3 that probably exceeds your 'insane' limit. Nobody will be forced to buy it!