It’s only a child safety issue if you’re illogical enough to place a child in a non safe seating position without an anchor.
It is a bloody recall and you’ve been flaming this thread for about two hours now.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Australian Model 3 Waiting Room
- Thread starter rgc1990
- Start date
It is a bloody recall and you’ve been flaming this thread for about two hours now.
Who wants Murphsters car? It’s missing a child seat anchor and can’t be driven.
Agreed
and it's nothing personal.I'm just going by the information available and drawing the most logical conclusions I can in my mind. I certainly can't guarantee I'm right.
It’s only a child safety issue if you’re illogical enough to place a child in a non safe seating position without an anchor.
It is a bloody recall and you’ve been flaming this thread for about two hours now.
It’s not just a recall though. For BYD it was a cease sale and recall.
And my point is that seems like a reason why deliveries have been delayed.
Wtf you talking about?
This is my point though, they haven't done that.
I don't think specific vehicles on the same ship had the modification (which we have no evidence that Tesla are even aware of) and certain others don't and on top of that that they all happen to be confined to specific DC's.
e-enthusiast30
Member
While that’s possible, it’s unlikely as they would have started with the customers who already have affected vehicles first. Have you heard anything from Tesla about your vehicle?
It’s fun to speculate, but I think it’ll be just a simple recall and we’ll all move on with our child-seat conforming vehicles post retrofit (if it turns out to need one).
It’s only a child safety issue if you’re illogical enough to place a child in a non safe seating position without an anchor.
It is a bloody recall and you’ve been flaming this thread for about two hours now.
And you are not getting the point, it has nothing to do with someone being dumb enough to put a child seat where there is no anchor. It is Australian law. You are not allowed to sell a car without one in Australia. This isn’t just a recall.
But you’re the only human who thinks that?
Nothing from Morton, Veda, or anyone who tracks these deliveries as at least a bloody side hustle.
Opinions, Assholes. I get it but some opinion are more backed in sound logical reason, you’re the first person to notice it and you’ve extrapolated from there to attempt to provide VINless folks with an answer. The answer has been posted, from verified sources, the VIN issue was due to allocation issues and those VINs weren’t taking into the deep dark fold, they were reallocated. I dare say without a bloody anchor.
God help me, Alhamdullah, I need Buddha.
I honestly think you’re frustrated and I get it, my partner gets the shits arguing with me too but she’s also completely illogical.
I don’t think people are saying it’s not an issue, they’re just disagreeing with you that it’s the reason for VIN reassignments.
Given that cars are still being delivered to people, this seems to be the explanation for me:
e-enthusiast30
Member
