You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also, for what it's worth, your horn cannot be honked and your lights cannot be flashed while you're driving (to the factual errors in the original article).
I know you can control the sunroof. I haven't tried the lights and horn.
If you are right, it's not a material issue.
I know you really want to control what I write, but it's not going to happen.
I don't see why you won't add a clarification to the original article at the top explaining to the media outlets who didn't understand your argument why they have it wrong and the Model S can't be 'hacked' out of the box.
Because if I spent time correcting mis-interpretations (especially mis-interpretations that are more likely than not willful) of my articles, they'd be filled with unparseable "clarifications".
As a side note, there seems to be some disagreement on whether or not changing your password invalidates all active tokens on the server. A number of people have run experiments where it does not (as it says in the article). Others have said it does.
If it turns out that it does expire, I would add that as a clarification because that's a material factual error. The other stuff you want clarifications on aren't factual errors, they just aren't the way you'd like them presented.
I don't believe that he deliberately set out to provoke an argument. IMO, the term "troll" is not a fair one to use.
With this line of thinking, you leave me no choice to assume that anything on your blog is implicitly untrustworthy-to-everyone-but-you because you might assume gravity doesn't exist or some other random thing.the premise is implicitly stated for my target audience in this blog.
Also, for what it's worth, your horn cannot be honked and your lights cannot be flashed while you're driving (to the factual errors in the original article).
The hell it's not a material issue. The "safest car ever tested by NHTSA" was just characterized as "hackable" to the degree that a third party can flash your lights at will. Now imagine down you're driving down a two lane road at night and a "hacker" flashes your lights at random and that this blinds an oncoming motorist. Now you have a safety issue. Yet you think this is not "material" to the headlines flying around about your post. Unbelievable.I know you can control the sunroof. I haven't tried the lights and horn.
If you are right, it's not a material issue.
With this line of thinking, you leave me no choice to assume that anything on your blog is implicitly untrustworthy-to-everyone-but-you because you might assume gravity doesn't exist or some other random thing.
But knowing the controversy that has occurred: If I were you, and I wanted to minimize confusion, I would feel a responsibility to make it clear that Tesla hasn't offered the API for this 3rd party use to date and that if you don't give your password to 3rd parties you remain secure. This has nothing to do with fanboyism or such. The reaction of the non-technical press shows that clarity is lacking.
Well you've rarely directly answered any of my challenges (and apparently those of others as well), so it was a boring conversation anyway.I think my conversation with you is done here.
I intend to address these issues in a follow-up article. I think those items are too complex and largely tangential to the overall point to just shove into the current article.
Your provocative and sensational headlines screaming, 'Flaws', 'hack' 'take control', 'danger' are nothing short of screaming FIRE in a crowded theatre.
Did I miss anything?
Did I miss anything?
Did I miss anything?