Assertion: arclength(0,100)==arclength(100,200)==arclength(200,400)
Conclusion: exponential
Incorrect, this is not exponential.
For exponential you'd want...
- AL(200,400) == AL(100,200) == AL(50,100) == AL(25,50)=...
- AL(100,200) == 2*[AL(50,100)+AL(25,50)+..]
- AL(100,200) > 2*[AL(50,100)+AL(25,50)+..]
Put more simply, for an exponential scale if the arc length for any two segments is identical then the numerical distance for those two segments must not be the same. As such, for (0,100] and (100,200) to be matched then we know it's not an exponential scale.
How can you tell the scale for regen arc with only one non-zero data point? It could be linear. It could be exponential. It could be exponential squared.
I'll add a 4th nit: I don't like the open-ended (no numbers, no ticks) nature of the arc, especially in the interesting/controversial 450-550 kW range.
For me this is one of the most important instruments in the vehicle, so it needs to be the most refined and functional.