What? 235 km is not an unusual spacing. Maybe you're confusing miles and kilometres? Now if by "US" you mean Chicagoland, New Jersey, Florida and parts of California, well then I'd agree...
...
UPDATE: I entered Toronto SC to Kingston into Google maps - it's actually closer to 250 km, not the 235 km quoted in the comments above. I'm more inclined to agree that this is a bit far for "never have to think about it" comfort. ...250 km is still not a problem in an 85.
Glad you re-thought it a bit and partly realized your initial conclusion was not so great and corrected it.
Still, I feel you're adding unhelpful confusion and a serious disservice to Canadian Tesla owners who live thousands of miles east of your own location.
It's inappropriate to ignore the important cold reality that the Toronto and S. Ontario area has among the very densest of all daily traffic volumes anywhere in N. America.
Meantime, in contrast, an unfilled Kingston-Toronto SC gap would be among the largest SC gaps anywhere in the US (or Germany or Norway), and certainly unlike anything around any place with anything like its traffic volume.
Take just one glance at supercharge.info at many/most current SC routes in the warmer US (look at thru Colorado, up the US west cost, up the US east cost, Washington to Chicago).
Obviously, ALL of these have ~regularly placed SCs clearly more closely spaced on average than what an unfilled Toronto-Kingston spacing would be.
And likewise for Germany (yes, Autobahn speeds) and for S. Norway (yes, cold) <-- you can see Europe by panning the map across the Atlantic.
When you're "powered by electricity" (and not just by rain
(<--just for fun)), it's unreasonable to compare Toronto-Kingston-Montreal to the most remote of all US routes you can possibly find...
like maybe across S. Dakota -- where the SC spacing is STILL a tad better than unfilled Toronto-Kingston.
My pragmatic and constructive thought for us (and for Tesla) tries to be based on something like a realistic assessment of present and near-term need, not on trying to imagine or claim how low we can stoop to poor circumstances:
- (a) let's not just ignore those with an S60 or the future Model 3,
- (b) let's not ignore the Cdn. temp. factor (anywhere east of Vancouver Island), and
- (c) let's not have excessive Canadian humility that gladly accepts a barely-acceptable solution that's less than what's standard elsewhere and that may work for some under near-ideal circumstances.
(Yes, clearly we need critically important Kingston first...)