To be fair to the OP, he(?) didn't say it was a deal-breaker.
I can relate to OP. Like him, I can afford this car, but to me, like him, $1000 is not nothing. When I recently ordered the Model X, I went through all the options with a fine-tooth comb and weighed them carefully against their cost.
THIS.
I too am fortunate enough to be able to afford this car. And like
@Trnsl8r said, $1k isn't small change to me. $20 isn't small change to me. We all draw individual lines that we aren't willing to cross when it comes to luxury goods. So for me and my family, sure we could have afforded the P100DL. But for
us, the P was excessive, and therefore exceeded out
set budget for this car.
With regard to paying for the Full Self-Driving Capability- we decided
not to activate this option, because the information on the website clearly states that regulatory approval is needed, and anyone living in the US knows that things like this flow at glacial speed. If miraculously self-driving cars become legal in 4-5 years, and we haven't traded our X in, then sure, we'll consider paying the activation fee.
Now- should Tesla enable as of yet announced capabilities short of full self-driving, available only to those who coughed up the $3k from the beginning, then I'll call bullsh*t, point out false advertising, and request all 8 cameras be activated for $3k (instead of $4k).
To
me, one of the marvels of Tesla is Enhanced Autopilot, therefore I paid for it. I would absolutely not consider one to be foolish for buying a Tesla without EAP. That's an entirely personal decision.
Best of luck on your decision making process, and remember, at the end of the day, you'll still be in a Model X, one of the safest and most badass-looking SUVs on the planet (in my humble opinion)