You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pretty sure the wait list stuff will be over soon.
The thing that boggles the mind is that none of the other vendors apparently are considering switching to the Tesla plug - which would give them access to Tesla chargers, J1772, and CHAdeMO. But I guess they all consider it a strategic mistake to "endorse" anything Tesla...No, what is really crazy is owning a BMW i3 and only being able to fast charge at a few CCS chargers, even though they have chademo versions for Japan. Once again, Tesla leads the way (no other car supports more than one DC charge standard).
The thing that boggles the mind is that none of the other vendors apparently are considering switching to the Tesla plug - which would give them access to Tesla chargers, J1772, and CHAdeMO. But I guess they all consider it a strategic mistake to "endorse" anything Tesla...
Tesla's DC charging solution is pretty damn good. I mean, in a connector that is smaller than a J1772 connector they have DC charging that is over 2x as fast as the CHAdeMO ridiculously huge connector as well as AC charging. One port. Why has no one else done this?!
it has proven by others in similar situations (e.g. Apple) to be the best solution for their customers.
we're drifting off topic here :-/I know many Apple users, whose accessories are not compatible with their latest connector, that may beg to differ with you on that point. :wink:
Well, the car communicates with the charger how much current it wants. Because of the slower charge at medium SOC levels it is possible that CHAdeMO gives a higher current longer into the charge (we had this long discussion about people limited to 60kW on some superchargers - they also reported higher currents at higher SOCs). But I definitely have seen the CHAdeMO taper past 70% or so - my guess is it's just a different profile. I can't see why it would be less 'safe' as it's the same electronics managing the charging process. And given the 12 months of beta testing they had my guess is this has been looked into in great detail.Sidebar question on CHAdeMO charging: is it as "safe" for the battery pack as Supercharging? The very few times I have used a CHAdeMO, I have not noticed the same taper/rampdown effect. Is that because the CHAdeMO is only 50kW max to begin with?
Sidebar question on CHAdeMO charging: is it as "safe" for the battery pack as Supercharging? The very few times I have used a CHAdeMO, I have not noticed the same taper/rampdown effect. Is that because the CHAdeMO is only 50kW max to begin with?
Chademo is supposed to be 62.5 Kw max. The manufacturers have determined that 50 Kw is enough.
A lot of the supercharger taper is due to pack heating. At 40-50kW the pack isn't going to heat 1/4 as much as it does at 100-120kW. 50kW is actually still under the 0.7C rate that most lithium-ion cells are charged at without liquid cooling.
Thanks wk057. For the record, my actual draw was not actually 50kW, but more in the low 40s, I believe.